Debate : 9057


Off-Topic / Debate / 9057	9056 \| 9058

Subject:	Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!")
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Thu, 25 Jan 2001 22:45:52 GMT
Viewed:	864 times

Jennifer Clark wrote: > > Darwinian Evolution and the Big Bang theories were never presented as being related to > each other in any way. Hmmm....I wish I had seen this earlier. Did you happen to follow the link to "Answers to commonly asked questions about the $250, 000 Offer" (http://www.drdino.com/articles/FAQ250000.jsp)? He addresses every point that you mentioned in your previous post so rather than me try and defend him I urge you to read the defense written by himself. -- -TiM NB, CA http://echofx.itgo.com t_c_c@yahoo.com 3ch0fx

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!")
(...) Actually, he doesn't address the points I make - all he produces is more sophistry and verbal obfuscation, the main thrust of that being that anything with the word "evolution" in it is akin to Darwin's Theory of Evolution. I have provided a (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!")
(...) I've detailed this in previous posts, including the following one where I made a distinction between evolution as a process and the theory of evolution: (URL) that we are discussing material presented in schools, and so I will reiterate here (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

78 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search