Subject:
|
Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!")
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 24 Jan 2001 02:41:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
715 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tim Culberson writes:
> Again I apologize if I'm re-hashing what has already been discussed due
> to my not following these discussions from the beginning but I assume by
> saying that (and I do agree with that statement) I can also state with
> the same implications that "Evolution" (in terms of the origins of earth
> and all living things) is also NOT science, but rather a theory.
Do you understand what a theory is? Do you understand that gravity is a
theory? Do you understand that science deals in theories all the time?
> If you
> DO in fact disagree with this please please please hurry back to my
> previously cited website http://www.drdino.com and collect your $250,
> 000 (that's a heck of a lot of LEGO!).
>
> > Quote
>
> Evolution is positively anti-science. Science deals with >things that are testable, observable, and demonstrable and evolution has
> none of those qualities.
Man's best friend (dogs). Tested, observed, and demonstrable. Perhaps you
may wish to be more specific. In any case, note above that science deals
with things theoritical.
> To call evolution "science"
> Is to confuse fairy tales with facts. True, evolution has been mixed
> with science for the last thirty years, but that does not mean that
> it is the same as science.
Ummm, more like 150 years. Dang, I forget when Darwin published.
> Beer is often advertised during sporting
> events but the two subjects have no logical connection, and evolution has
> no more to do with science than beer has to do with sports."
I'm not sure I would have chosen an analogy between beer and evolution and
mention "no logical connection" at the same time. ;-)
Bruce
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
78 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
