Subject:
|
George Bush has legitimised terrorism
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sat, 17 Apr 2004 19:25:30 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1886 times
|
| |
|
|
I thought this was a great
article. Two key sections of text:
“Two nights ago, this most dangerous man, George Bush, talked about “freedom in
Iraq”. Not “democracy” in Iraq. No, “democracy” was no longer mentioned.
“Democracy” was simply left out of the equation. Now it was just “freedom” -
freedom from Saddam rather than freedom to have elections. And what is this
“freedom” supposed to involve? One group of American-appointed Iraqis will cede
power to another group of American-appointed Iraqis. That will be the “historic
handover” of Iraqi “sovereignty”.
“I kid thee not. This is the Christian fundamentalist belief, which even the
Israeli embassy in Washington go along with - without comment, of course - in
their weekly Christian Zionist prayer meetings. Every claim by Osama bin Laden,
every statement that the United States represents Zionism and supports the theft
of Arab lands will now have been proved true to millions of Arabs, even those
who had no time for Bin Laden. What better recruiting sergeant could Bin Laden
have than George Bush. Doesn’t he realise what this means for young American
soldiers in Iraq or are Israelis more important than American lives in
Mesopotamia?”
I really hope Kerry wins.
Scott A
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: George Bush has legitimised terrorism
|
| (...) Well, heck, those wacky Iraqis might vote for Islamic extremists - an eventuality that the Guy Not Elected by "Yankees" did not even consider. Gotta save them from themselves, don't you know. Let's face it, why should Bush support the will of (...) (20 years ago, 19-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
97 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
