Subject:
|
Re: "regulating Liberals"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 20 Apr 2004 20:57:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2385 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd wrote:
|
| |
| |
Gotta save them from themselves, don’t you know.
|
What gives? Isn’t that the very mantra of regulating Liberals?
|
...and this comes from the same person who
said: “to advocate
complete freedom without responsibility is to be an Anarchist, not a
freedom-lover”
|
Not sure what you are saying here. When I said “responsibility”, I meant
personal responsibility.
|
What if your countrymen shirk that “responsibility”?
| |
As I have stated elsewhere, Freedom without
morality is doomed. I don’t need an amoral government to be my conscience.
|
But you welcome one which reflects your own narrow moral views?
Scott A
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: "regulating Liberals"
|
| (...) Not sure what you are saying here. When I said "responsibility", I meant personal responsibility. As I have stated elsewhere, Freedom without morality is doomed. I don't need an amoral government to be my conscience. JOHN (20 years ago, 20-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
97 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
