To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 23776
23775  |  23777
Subject: 
Re: George Bush has legitimised terrorism
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 21 Apr 2004 06:21:37 GMT
Viewed: 
2561 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd wrote:



  
   To answer it as a general statement, it is a religious (or cultutal) thing, not a racist thing. Generally speaking, religious fanatics don’t want to be free, or at least don’t want you to be free of them. That goes for just about any culture, any race.

Ah, but then in the interests of diversity and multiculturalism, do we have a responsibility to allow them to be as they are (killing, oppressing, etc), or should we enlighten them (eg liberate and teach democracy and freedom)? No matter how bigotted it sounds, isn’t our way (Freedom and Democracy) really the best way for the whole world? Don’t we believe that everyone deserves freedom? What is so wrong with fostering and encouraging these principles?

And we now loop back to:

Well, heck, those wacky Iraqis might vote for Islamic extremists...

Hmmm, sounds like a case of tyranny of the majority, then? BTW, I like that phrase “wacky Iraqi”:-)
  


  
   You got the last word wrong: substitute “converatives” for “liberals.” Conservatives don’t want (their) businesses regulated, but they want your personal life regulated.

lol Not really. They just don’t want other people’s “personal life” in their face.

I must disagree - conservatives want to control others lives and make sure that they conform to their own personal life (i.e. they want their conservative personal life in everyone else’s face - “say my prayers at your school, ya liberal regulators!”).

Well... speaking for myself (a conservative), I must disagree. Look, I don’t care about your personal life. Keep it personal, don’t break the law, be responsible, and I don’t care what you do. You know that prayers are never mandatory in schools (even the pledge isn’t). Having said that, I would prefer prayers and religion remain out of (public) schools, but I certainly want the values that religions such as Christianity and Judaism teach upheld at schools-- values such as respect, honesty, decency, honor, tolerance, etc. It’s not the religion I want in everyone’s face, it’s the values they represent.

  
  
  
  
   Let’s face it, why should Bush support the will of the people? If he did he wouldn’t be President. :-) :-(

He supports the will of the people who wrote our Constitution the way they did-- you don’t seriously have a problem with that, do you?

I’ll address this when you address what I said. :-)

lol Well, for all intents and purposes, the “will of the people” was fairly evenly divided. So, in effect, Bush has the green light no matter what he does;-)

No, he lost. He has the red light no matter what he does.

Are you advocating more tyranny of the majority?? :-)

   And now I suppose I’m stuck having to answer your question - I’m not convinced in his interpretation of the Constitution, nor am I convinced that he doesn’t dance around it when it is convenient to him.

They all do it; it’s called politics. It’s little wonder that most politicians are lawyers. Don’t even get me started on lawyers;-)

  
  
  
But I have to
   wonder: what is the record length of time for milking a joke? Surely the teat is dry by now? :-)

1) I wish it was a joke. 2) Okay, so my wish came true after a fashion: Bush is a joke (if not a funny one). 3) To actually answer your question: until he actually wins.

But won’t his incumbency play a large role in his second victory? Spoils begotten from illegitimate gains? :-)


Okay, you convinced me - he never escapes the joke. :-)

I suspected as much! :-)

JOHN



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: George Bush has legitimised terrorism
 
(...) And we now loop back to: Well, heck, those wacky Iraqis might vote for Islamic extremists... (...) I must disagree - conservatives want to control others lives and make sure that they conform to their own personal life (i.e. they want their (...) (21 years ago, 20-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

97 Messages in This Thread:


























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR