Subject:
|
"regulating Liberals"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 20 Apr 2004 19:05:32 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2332 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd wrote:
|
| |
| |
Gotta save them from themselves, don’t you know.
|
What gives? Isn’t that the very mantra of regulating Liberals?
|
...and this comes from the same person who
said: “to advocate complete
freedom without responsibility is to be an Anarchist, not a freedom-lover”
Scott A
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: "regulating Liberals"
|
| (...) Not sure what you are saying here. When I said "responsibility", I meant personal responsibility. As I have stated elsewhere, Freedom without morality is doomed. I don't need an amoral government to be my conscience. JOHN (20 years ago, 20-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: George Bush has legitimised terrorism
|
| (...) I think it is a bit offensive and even racist to believe that any human being wouldn't want to be free if truly given the chance. (...) What gives? Isn't that the very mantra of regulating Liberals? (...) He supports the will of the people who (...) (20 years ago, 19-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
97 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
