Subject:
|
Re: George Bush has legitimised terrorism
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 21 Apr 2004 20:13:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3550 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd wrote:
|
| |
| |
Mine is that the people involved (Iraq) may well not want that. You really
can’t drag them to that kicking and screaming if they don’t want it. If 75%
want religious fanatics, that’s what they are going to get.
|
You are advocating the tyranny of the majority. Would you advocate that here
in this country? Regardless, the majority of Iraqis want the US to assist
them to set up a free Iraq. The terrorists are a vast (criminal) minority
and should be hunted down and exterminated.
|
No, I am not advocating a tyrany of the majority, I’m saying that is the
practical outcome. It recognizing what the difference between what you might
want, and what you get.
-->Bruce<--
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: George Bush has legitimised terrorism
|
| (...) The examples of the things we have right are theories-- the examples of things we don't are specifics in trying to apply those theories. Of course we aren't perfect, but we have the perfect blueprint of government-- namely Freedom and (...) (20 years ago, 21-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
97 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
