Subject:
|
Re: "regulating Liberals"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 20 Apr 2004 20:46:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2433 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd wrote:
|
| |
| |
Gotta save them from themselves, don’t you know.
|
What gives? Isn’t that the very mantra of regulating Liberals?
|
...and this comes from the same person who
said: “to advocate
complete freedom without responsibility is to be an Anarchist, not a
freedom-lover”
|
Not sure what you are saying here. When I said “responsibility”, I meant
personal responsibility. As I have stated elsewhere, Freedom without morality
is doomed. I don’t need an amoral government to be my conscience.
JOHN
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | "regulating Liberals"
|
| (...) ...and this comes from the same person who (URL) said>: "to advocate complete freedom without responsibility is to be an Anarchist, not a freedom-lover" Scott A (21 years ago, 20-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
97 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
