Subject:
|
Re: Bad Policy #2 (Why all the secrecy, LEGO Direct?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego.direct
|
Date:
|
Tue, 15 May 2001 13:00:14 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1680 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.lego.direct, Jeff Thompson writes:
> In lugnet.lego.direct, Richard Marchetti writes:
> > Make of it what you will -- you'll get the last word.
>
> That was never my intention. I did hope that we would at
> least agree on which topic to argue.
I hope this discussion DOES continue, you guys have found a promising new
line of analysis, I think!
Jeff's description of a vicious circle in product development (moving more
and more in the Jr direction as the effects of previous jrization show up in
product play time and retention time marketing studies) is particularly apt.
And scary!
++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Bad Policy #2 (Why all the secrecy, LEGO Direct?)
|
| (...) You're right, Larry! And you know how I hate it when that happens... =oP I had a co-worker, who shall remain nameless, who possesses this kind of short attention span. We had gone to TRU together a few times -- and while I always made for the (...) (23 years ago, 15-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Bad Policy #2 (Why all the secrecy, LEGO Direct?)
|
| (...) I agree, and I had a sneaking feeling that if we compared notes we would find much congruence between our theories. Getting back to the topic of pirates, if, as you noted, Pirates sold so well at its introduction, and if, as I surmised, it (...) (23 years ago, 15-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
79 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
