To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.lego.directOpen lugnet.lego.direct in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 LEGO Company / LEGO Direct / 2462
2461  |  2463
Subject: 
Re: Bad Policy #2 (Why all the secrecy, LEGO Direct?)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.lego.direct
Date: 
Mon, 7 May 2001 15:33:09 GMT
Viewed: 
1144 times
  
In lugnet.lego.direct, Dave Schuler writes:
To those who signed the NDA: I respect your choice and, frankly, envy your
awareness of upcoming releases.  However, it's amazing to me that the only

For the record, I have never signed an NDA with LEGO and I have not had any
private communication with LD in a long time.

KL



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Bad Policy #2 (Why all the secrecy, LEGO Direct?)
 
(...) Noted! I didn't mean to address that part specifically to you, but I was on a roll. Dave! (one may infer from the tone of my invective that I have likewise signed no NDA nor had private communication with TLC or any of its tentacles.) (23 years ago, 7-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Bad Policy #2 (Why all the secrecy, LEGO Direct?)
 
(...) But they don't want it kept secret; if they did, they wouldn't have spilled anything to anyone. Suz hit it right on the head when she called it fan management. TLC wants to manufacture interest in something for which we have no solid (...) (23 years ago, 7-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)

79 Messages in This Thread:

























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR