To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.legoOpen lugnet.lego in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 LEGO Company / 3276
3275  |  3277
Subject: 
Re: Reply 4: A simple case of communication courtesy
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.color, lugnet.lego
Date: 
Mon, 14 Mar 2005 18:51:28 GMT
Viewed: 
1779 times
  
In lugnet.color, Jake McKee wrote:
   In lugnet.color, Christian Treczoks wrote:
   One short note beforehand: If you consider this reply mindless criticising, tell me so. But it is intended to hint at something you might not have noticed and thefor be unaware of.

Actually, I think that this note, as well as all of your other multi-part replies are wonderful examples of how to best have a useful conversation. I’m happy to participate in these as long as the discussion goes on. It’s the ones where I/we are being called fools that turn me off from responding, and often reading.

   One common mistake there is that you and your team members regularly fail to reply to a direct communication. This is something that should not happen. Communication 101 says that you should at least acknowledge receipt of information. Even better would be reply telling what you are going to do with this information, and even better would be an information on when a reaction is to be expected.

Fair enough.

I’m doing my best to reply and acknowledge everything I read and receive. (As is Jan) The trouble comes from the sheer volume of communication and the small number of people involved. Kate (when she was working on community) and Jan are both responsible for other non-community related tasks on top of their community support roles. I’m the only person that is working full-time with adult fans at the moment, and even that is new within the last 2+ years. (Trust me, I’d LOVE to have this change... and hopefully after this year when, fingers crossed, our budget numbers improve, I’ll be able to add some help) SNIP
Ok, I fully understand the volume to be staggering. Thus I make this suggestion: As soon as you get a chance, contact you favorite IT guy in house.. ask him about setting up an auto response/receipt acknowledgement for incoming external mail. Part of this is the psychology. I know that when I send an email, I feel better if I recieve even an automated ‘Message Received!’. I usually can tell it’s an automated response, but at least I know it got there.. It also tells me ‘Hey We got your message, but we get a lot of messages, so please understand you may not get a personalized/personal response’ thus setting my expectations and allowing me to let it go more easily if I don’t get a response (Like on the pneumatics parts packs...hey if you get the chance could you let me know who to talk to about large deals, forward my name to them. Like the one where Maersk ordered enough to justify Lego producing something they weren’t en masse? I may be able to drum up a large enough backing to fund such for pneumatics, just a thought)



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Reply 4: A simple case of communication courtesy
 
(...) Actually, I think that this note, as well as all of your other multi-part replies are wonderful examples of how to best have a useful conversation. I'm happy to participate in these as long as the discussion goes on. It's the ones where I/we (...) (20 years ago, 14-Mar-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.lego, FTX)

79 Messages in This Thread:






































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR