Subject:
|
Re: IMPORTANT - [ldraw.org] Official Model Repository
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Fri, 11 Jun 1999 20:54:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1024 times
|
| |
|
|
On 6/11/99, at 3:08 PM, Tim Courtney wrote:
> We can accept inlined models, but we will be breaking them up • and
> reconstructing them as submodels in an mpd format. So please • send them if
> you would like to contribute. We need to take all the models • we can to get
> a substantial repository going right away.
Tim, I'm the person who was supposed to be helping with the
reviewing and
editting so that 'we' also refers to me. Who else was willing to
help? I'll still
review and edit, but could someone else do the MPDing and
un-inlining?
> > Actually, the way I thought we had agreed on was
> > 0 name: M7140-99.dat
> > 0 X-Wing Fighter
> > 0 Author: LEGO(or TLG)
>
> This line (above) is not needed if we put 'official model • repository' in it
> - because in the description of the official model repository • it states
> they are models of TLG sets.
Fine, replace that line with 'o. m. r.'
> > 0 Author: Ryan Dennett(& whatever else you want for yourself)
> > and if you want, the web address could be added, but • personally
> > I hate
> > long headers.
>
> No web address, I agree its too long.
> > > >
> > > > How is this for a header? 5 lines isn't bad IMO. It gives
> > all the necessary
>
> > > > information as well. This header should be on the submodels • too, with Set:
> > > > being replaced by something identifying it as a submodel for • a
> > certain set
> > > > (ie. Submodel: Upper Left Wing Assembly for 7140 X-Wing • Fighter) Please let
> > > > me know what you all think of this.
> >
> > Like Jeff mentioned, submodels should have the same header
> > except it should be
> > something like this
> > 0 Name: M7140a.dat
> > 0 X-Wing left wing
> > etc.
>
> Yes, but the word 'submodel' should be mentioned in there as
well.
so change the 2nd line to read
0 X-Wing left wing submodel
Who else besides Jeff and myself were working on this? I was
under the
impression that we were the ones heading it up. I just want to
know because
it seems that the standards we had agreed upon are be
disregarded and not
accepted. Just to try and make my self clearer what I am trying
to say is that
if we were 'put in charge' of the model repository, then we
should be the ones
making the decisions on headers and model title, etc. We had
done that, but
it seems to me that what we had come up with is being regarded
as inadaquate,
even though it was quite thorough.
Ryan
"Build or build not. There is no try." - Lego Master Yoda
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
94 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
