 | | Re: Moon Landing Hoax
|
|
(...) ***light-heartedness on*** There's self-deprecating humor and simple farce, of course, but those also refer to Fox News Channel. ***light-heartedness off*** Dave! (26 years ago, 15-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Lugnet News Server (To Todd)
|
|
Todd, Hi there! I would like to know what software do you use for News Server. I am looking for a good one that can be customized as you did with Lugnet's. Best regards, -- Felipe G. Coury Gerente de Desenvolvimento Creation Internet Business (URL) (...) (26 years ago, 15-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Moon Landing Hoax
|
|
(...) Loosen up a little. Can you point out humor that doesn't make fun of or bash someone or something else? -Duane (26 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Moon Landing Hoax
|
|
(...) Like James said my post was meant as Fun Mocking not nasty mocking. It wasn't meant as bashing at all. Fox is what it is and I was making Fun of it. If you took it another way then I am sorry but I won't apologize for directing it where I did (...) (26 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Moon Landing Hoax
|
|
(...) This message has been nothing more than the Fox News Channel bashing, that is why, hence debate. (...) Because I do not like seeing debate material outside where it belongs, among others. Scott S. -- ***...*** Please visit (URL) (26 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: GA State Flag
|
|
(...) You can find one to scale down at (URL) _think_ that it's being slowly phased in and isn't going to be "the official flag" for a few more weeks while they all get sewn together... -JDF (26 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
(...) For posting in BST? That's not quite how I remember it...I thought it was for excessive multiposting -- across multiple themed groups. I guess there was a discussion about BST once... (URL) (26 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | next/prev links in web interface
|
|
Todd, Please consider putting the next/prev (1606 1608 for example) links at BOTH the top and the bottom of a displayed post in the web interface. I find that I often scroll down to read a multi screen post, then need to scroll back up to hit the (...) (26 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | GA State Flag
|
|
Todd, Minor issue here. GA's state flag changed earlier this month. I don't know where you got your flag graphics from, but GA's in now different. Mike ----- Mike Faunce mike at faunce dot com (26 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
(...) I agree. James said "upper end of cottage" as a fuzzy line. I am nowhere near that boundary. Todd (sort of) said "automation with no human contact" as the demarcation for shopping. Judgement is required here, since when you call one of the (...) (26 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
(...) If it's a straight sale, then .market.buy-sell-trade; if it's an auction (i.e., soliciting progressively higher bids from earlier bids), then market.auction, if you're a retailer (e.g., BusyBee, TRU, Target, S@H, etc.) or you're posting (...) (26 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
Larry Pieniazek wrote in message ... (...) initial (...) incorporated. (...) I don't know, but DYA got reprimanded for posting to BST. I thought that "real" stores weren't suppose to post in BST. Maybe Todd needs to update the BST descriptions. (...) (26 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
(...) Hmm, good question. I'm not Todd, but I'd be inclined to set the (fuzzy) line at the (indistinct) top edge of cottage industry. How's that for precision? (...) It's a difference of degree, technically, but I'd call it kind, at least for Lugnet (...) (26 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
(...) Thanks for that clarification, Rose, but now you got me wondering, do Guild of Bricksmiths announcements (of straight sale stuff, not stuff like initial unit auctions, which get announced in .auctions like all other auctions) belong in (...) (26 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
Please read the group discussions before you post such rudely written posts. Note Buy-Sale-Trade; "Community trading post, items wanted, items for straight sale (no auctions), experiences, market analysis, etc." With the emphasis on community (or (...) (26 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
(...) My mistake. It didn't show up on my newsreader, but it shows on the web interface. ~Mark "Muffin Head" Sandlin (26 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
(...) ... (...) Mark S., I thought it was OK as long as the X-Real-Life-Name identifies you. If I look at the full headers for his post, I see: X-Real-Life-Name: Mark Papenfuss /Eric McC/ (26 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
mfuss903 wrote in message ... <a great deal of stuff...> Just to clarify, my message asking whether Jake's post was appropriate in .announce was directed ONLY to lugnet.admin.general, not to lego.direct, and the admin posts don't appear on the main (...) (26 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Fix for a broken link
|
|
Todd, In the (URL) page their is a link to Matt's Track Designer. The link to this was changed when I took over the hosting of The Train Depot. The new link is (URL) (26 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
(...) For us AFOLs, it was an incredibly nice thing to do. And for LD, it's a nice way to gather a data point on our buying power. It's a win-win. But... (...) Actually, it doesn't really belong in the main .announce group -- it was an unsolicited (...) (26 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
(...) Sounds like you're the one who needs to relax. Read Mark's post... probably better than I could write in reply to you. Dude, chill out, the inflammatory nature of your messages telling people to relax is pretty durn hypocritical. -Tim (26 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
(...) There are specific guidelines set up on the newsgroups to keep things orderly. If people posted anywhere they liked, things would get rather messy and confusing. When I was a newbie, I posted an auction announcement to .space, and people (...) (26 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
(...) Why not?? I mean true, it is not for trade - but it is for SALE and you can BUY it - right? I think sometimes you people have lost sight of the forest, AND are missing the trees while you are at it. R-E-L-A-X !!!! (26 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
All in all, what does it really matter???? I mean, they made a SPECIAL effort to offer these sets to US FIRST - they could have easily ignored us alltogether, but no - They gave us first shot. I would definitely say this belongs in all of the (...) (26 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Todd, can you explain the search function again?
|
|
(...) I should say can't always; the first reply was just after a meeting and just before lunch -- happened to check in and see it just after you posted it. (...) Ah, neat...it worked. I love Forte Free Agent! And it's really nice on my Crusoe (...) (26 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Todd, can you explain the search function again?
|
|
(...) other rather than as separate "words," ya? My parser doesn't expect the < and the > to occur in the same word. I'll need to fix that before you can put them so close together. If you type <10 >10 (note the space character between the "0" and (...) (26 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Block List?
|
|
"Tim Courtney" <tim@zacktron.com> wrote in message news:G8nrIv.KFs@lugnet.com... (...) Make that two annoying (and this second one incredibly rude and arrogant) posters. -Tim (26 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Todd, can you explain the search function again?
|
|
(...) (URL)There's also this, which isn't linked in yet: (...) I know the previous search was suspected of causing you system-wide problems but the cool thing about it was being able to search for posts made by particular individuals and getting (...) (26 years ago, 12-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Block List?
|
|
"Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:G8K59x.LF3@lugnet.com... (...) Well I finally blocked a very annoying poster on my newsreader, and would like to do that on the web too. (...) Cool... can we talk tomorrow about this at BC? (...) (26 years ago, 12-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Posting Failure to lugnet robotics
|
|
I have been trying for a week or two to get posting via email working. It works via the web, but I can not get it to work via mail. I get the followng response: Your message could not be accepted. Response from the news server: 441 Invalid mailer: (...) (26 years ago, 12-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Todd, can you explain the search function again?
|
|
(...) You should get this: (URL) doesn't see anything posted by Brad himself, so it starts with posts mentiong his name posted by others. (...) What URL appeared, and from what area (category) did you initiate the search? (...) I'd have to see the (...) (26 years ago, 12-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Todd, can you explain the search function again?
|
|
Todd: I have read the search function described at: (URL) I can't see that the instructions there work. For example: when searching "brad justus <10 >10", without the quotes, what ideally should I get back as a result set? What I got was stuff from (...) (26 years ago, 12-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
Well on the same note the post doesn't belong in BST either. Rose Kevin Wilson wrote in message ... (...) my (...) (26 years ago, 11-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
(...) It's not, no... But fortunately, there's a simple solution for future things of this type -- LD can (please) post to the .announce.lsahs group instead of the main .announce group. The .announce.lsahs group is specifically set up for LEGO Shop (...) (26 years ago, 11-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
(...) Good question. I don't think it is. I saw it, did a double take, got a little grated by it, but figured it was an honest mistake and given the tension lately with LD, I figured it best not to say something...for now. (...) --Todd (26 years ago, 11-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
Jake McKee wrote in message ... (...) This is great that Jake is letting us know about this stuff, but is it appropriate in lugnet.announce? I have deliberately *not* been announcing my commercial stuff in .announce because I thought it was not OK. (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet.lego.direct and its charter
|
|
(...) Hmm... after reading (URL) maybe my idea ain't such a good one. Oh well... it's just a bunch of plastic toys. What was I thinking anyway? :-P -Tom McD. when replying, to avoid non-stickage, use Pam on your spam. (26 years ago, 10-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Lugnet.lego.direct and its charter
|
|
After reading the .lego.direct charter, I was unclear if this message (URL) was appropriate for the group. Further digging led to (URL) where I concluded that message #1854 was not appropriate due to its use of a "tabloid-like" tone. I have no (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Block List?
|
|
(...) This again, huh? :-) Ya, I think there could be a way to do that. But I'd roll it in with a more general filter, where you ask the webserver to bump messages up or down in priority based on various criteria. I've been thinking a lot about (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Block List?
|
|
Todd - I know this has come up before...but could there be a way to block posters from appearing on the web interface similar to posts from newsgroups? You could either hook it up to the x-real-life-name or email address header items, and do a (...) (26 years ago, 7-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems contacting me ?
|
|
"Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:G8CLCz.F8z@lugnet.com... (...) reduce (...) unless (...) then (...) hidden, (...) One big problem I figure will occur with this proposed newsgroup idea is that anyone who just browses while (...) (26 years ago, 6-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems contacting me ?
|
|
(...) Thank you...yes... Oops... LOL :-) --Todd (26 years ago, 7-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems contacting me ?
|
|
(...) don't you mean more cons than pros... (...) Yea, I agree, I think lugnet.people probably is the best place. lugnet.market... is also acceptable I think. lugnet.general is probably ok, but not preferred (I'd actually really like to see us try (...) (26 years ago, 7-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems contacting me ?
|
|
(...) It probably is OK for lugnet.people -- that's prolly the safest spot, unless it happens a lot. I like the idea of a special "contact me" forum, but then again maybe it has more pros than cons -- it would be one step more hidden, and it's hard (...) (26 years ago, 6-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems contacting me ?
|
|
(...) Hmm, I just came up with a few ideas since we regularly see these types of things. The first would be lugnet.people.contact-me where people can post "hey, where is Fred, we were in the middle of a deal and I haven't got an e-mail in over a (...) (26 years ago, 6-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Links page
|
|
(...) Yeah, I just submitted an update for my page (I don't think I've had an account at cdc.net for at least 3 years) - doh! Serious Collector is gone, too - I guess it should be removed, but I guess Todd or Linc would need to make the call on (...) (26 years ago, 5-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Links page
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote in message ... (...) I'm amazed. So much of it is out of date I thought for sure it was not being updated. I'll write to Linc with additions and corrections. Thanks Todd. Kevin ---...--- Craftsman Lego Kits & Custom models: (URL) (...) (26 years ago, 5-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Dumb Question
|
|
(...) It's been there all along. --Todd (26 years ago, 5-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.us.ny, lugnet.loc.us.ny.alb, lugnet.loc.us.ny.bin, lugnet.loc.us.ny.buf, lugnet.loc.us.ny.syr, lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: Links page
|
|
(...) Linc Smith <lincolns@cogs.susx.ac.uk> actively maintains it. Last update was 2 days ago. --Todd (26 years ago, 5-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Links page
|
|
Todd, is the Links page at (URL) a historical artifact, or is it likely ever to be updated? If no-one is currently in charge of it I would be willing to take it on once the Town Building Contest is over... some time in March. Kevin ---...--- (...) (26 years ago, 5-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Dumb Question
|
|
Todd I was just wondering who suggested a newsgroup for Binghamton NY? I live here and there's been a lack of posts (that aren't mine) and was just wondering because this is a small town -- Kenneth A. Drumm Ph.D. who apologizes for the crossposts (...) (26 years ago, 5-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.us.ny, lugnet.loc.us.ny.alb, lugnet.loc.us.ny.bin, lugnet.loc.us.ny.buf, lugnet.loc.us.ny.syr, lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: News search function reactivated (was: News search function temporarily disabled)
|
|
(...) Todd, this would be really useful. I'll often search for a recent post, only remembering the poster's name and maybe one or two key-words, and that the post was in the past few days. I don't need two year old messages nearly as frequently. (...) (26 years ago, 5-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Netscape 6 Uglyness (was: Re: Filtering out Bionicle/Slizer/Roboriders posts)
|
|
(...) Ahh... Great fix Todd. I get the folloing message... "Oops! You have already submitted this article. The duplicate won't be posted." That should stop quite a bit of the double posting I think! Thanks, Eric Kingsley (26 years ago, 5-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Email copies of lugnet posts still working ?
|
|
(...) OH! OK, now that makes sense! Yes, it would be affected by cookies. (...) No, you were! I just read it wrong. --Todd (26 years ago, 4-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Email copies of lugnet posts still working ?
|
|
(...) Ahhh, OK... it appears that I did muck up the cookies. And, BTW, I was referring to the email'ed copies of my posts, *not* an email subscription to a newsgroup (sorry if I was not clear about this). My previous message went out from the iMac (...) (26 years ago, 4-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Email copies of lugnet posts still working ?
|
|
(...) It comes from a cookie called "NEWSPOST" or, if you're signed in, from a virtual cookie in your member record, which, lemme see...yes, you've got. (...) Apparently, somehow, yes. I don't know how, though. I don't see your email address in the (...) (26 years ago, 4-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Email copies of lugnet posts still working ?
|
|
(...) I see two blank fields. However, the header line in this 'post message' page has the correct info 'Ray Sanders <rsanders@svic.net> — Gopher Tortise DMZ'. Where does that come from. Have I been (or gotten myself) removed from the email (...) (26 years ago, 4-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Use of lugnet.lego.direct and lugnet.dear-lego
|
|
(...) Nope. Both he and Peter Frank flew in Friday night from Billund and they leave today. The purpose of their trip was solely to attend the Train Summit meeting. And to sample some fine NYC food, of course! :) Jake (26 years ago, 4-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Use of lugnet.lego.direct and lugnet.dear-lego
|
|
"Frank Filz" <ffilz@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:3A7CE7D3.D83AEE...ing.com... (...) Putting 2 and 2 together, isn't it the New York Toy Fair this week? Presume that's why they were in town. Perhaps they are going to unviel some trains (...) (26 years ago, 4-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Netscape 6 Uglyness (was: Re: Filtering out Bionicle/Slizer/Roboriders posts)
|
|
(...) Eric, what happens now when you go back and hit "OK"? --Todd (26 years ago, 4-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Use of lugnet.lego.direct and lugnet.dear-lego
|
|
I'd like to make a suggestion on the use of lugnet.lego.direct and lugnet.dear-lego. Of late there has been much "debate" about whether TLC is doing "the right thing" or not, or somewhere in between. While some very legitimate concerns are getting (...) (26 years ago, 4-Feb-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Email copies of lugnet posts still working ?
|
|
(...) Hmm, I don't see that email address (nor anything containing 'sanders' or 'svic', for that matter) anywhere in the subscription database. What do you see when you go here?-- (URL) (26 years ago, 4-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Email copies of lugnet posts still working ?
|
|
(...) They should be going to my nominal address 'Ray Sanders <rsanders@svic.net>'. Thats where they were going to up until sometime on the 1st. Since then nothing. I have had some problems with outgoing email, but other inbound is working (as far (...) (26 years ago, 4-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Email copies of lugnet posts still working ?
|
|
(...) Hmm, I don't see any bounce messages bearing your name or email address, and I don't see your email address listed in the subscription database. What email address are you receiving posts at? I can look and see what the server thinks it should (...) (26 years ago, 4-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Email copies of lugnet posts still working ?
|
|
Todd, Its been a few days since I received any email'ed copies of my lugnet posts. Is something broken ? The last one I got was two days ago. If my ISP is rejecting them, I *would* like to know about it. Ray (26 years ago, 4-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Netscape 6 Uglyness (was: Re: Filtering out Bionicle/Slizer/Roboriders posts)
|
|
(...) OK I guess it was my bad, I just tested it and it does come back with a warning message. It must have been me being "OK" happy when I got the message the first time. So it does warn you although the only choices are "OK" and "Cancel" so it (...) (26 years ago, 3-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Netscape 6 Uglyness (was: Re: Filtering out Bionicle/Slizer/Roboriders posts)
|
|
(...) Good thought! Thanks for mentioning this problem!!! (...) Eeek! -- that's worse than any accidental double-posting thing that MSIE ever did. It resubmitted the form without asking you whether you wanted to resubmit? Yikes!! Say, by chance do (...) (26 years ago, 2-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Netscape 6 Uglyness (was: Re: Filtering out Bionicle/Slizer/Roboriders posts)
|
|
This may be more of an FYI but I thought I ought to mention it. I recently Installed Netscape 6 and have been posting without a problem for a couple of days now. Today this message was posted as a duplicate doing something I have done with Netscape (...) (26 years ago, 1-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Search Syntax Help Needed
|
|
Todd, This is just the sort of thing I needed. Just to make sure, in this example (the last on the page): sensors and methods for mobile robot positioning <//2 you don't use 0s...I assume you can leave them out? -- Thomas Main main@appstate.edu (...) (26 years ago, 1-Feb-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Set list woes...
|
|
Yes i have had offers to buy sets i wanted to buy, (picked up a 8880 Mint at a good price) and other requests, instructions etc. I was quite happy to help them out. I don't mind it is all part of being in the Public Eye i suppose. They were all most (...) (26 years ago, 1-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Entry for the Town building contest (Was: Town building contest begins!)
|
|
Larry Pieniazek wrote in message ... (...) if (...) Doesn't seem to be Jump.cgi... I get the error page however I try and reach it. However, if I cut and paste it directly into the browser I get this page suggested: (URL) gives me instructions for (...) (26 years ago, 1-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Entry for the Town building contest (Was: Town building contest begins!)
|
|
(...) Whoops, nope, I take it back. (URL) (26 years ago, 31-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Entry for the Town building contest (Was: Town building contest begins!)
|
|
(...) I take it back -- there wasn't a jump.cgi bug at all. I've reverted it to the previous working version. I forgot that the % charcter becomes encoded by the article-display code, so the URL that invokes jump.cgi is actually this, with double (...) (26 years ago, 31-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Entry for the Town building contest (Was: Town building contest begins!)
|
|
(...) Thank you for drawing this to my attention -- indeed you are correct! Turns out I made an idiotic mistake in my URL rewriting mechanism -- whereby all %XX-encoded characters accidentally got decoded into raw 8-bit form and sent to the browser (...) (26 years ago, 31-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Entry for the Town building contest (Was: Town building contest begins!)
|
|
(...) It's my fault -- I just figured out what it was. Fixing coming soon. --Todd (26 years ago, 31-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Entry for the Town building contest (Was: Town building contest begins!)
|
|
(...) I'd love to, but I can't tracert outside the firewall I'm behind. If it's any help, IE explorer generates an "HTTP Error 406 - Not acceptable" error very quickly. James (26 years ago, 31-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Entry for the Town building contest (Was: Town building contest begins!)
|
|
(...) Try a tracert to the place you're trying to go to. So far, try as we might to stick jump.cgi with the blame, it's always been something else, usually slow networks somewhere. ++Lar (26 years ago, 31-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Entry for the Town building contest (Was: Town building contest begins!)
|
|
(...) Looks like a jump.cgi problem... If I click on the link, it doesn't work; if I cut & paste it into the address bar, it works. James (redirecting to .admin.general) (26 years ago, 31-Jan-01, to lugnet.town, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.technic.bionicle?
|
|
"Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:G81FBK.2KG@lugnet.com... (...) sets (...) That was quick! Fantastic -- thanks Todd. Huw (26 years ago, 31-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Search Syntax Help Needed
|
|
(...) Thomas, Have a look here and let me know what you think: (URL) sure I missed some things, but I can go back and add them later. --Todd (26 years ago, 31-Jan-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Search Syntax Help Needed
|
|
(...) OK, lemme see about putting together some docs. As ++Lar once mentioned, we need context-sensitive help here. If I make some help pages, they can be linked to from various spots. Keep your eyes peeled for help links. --Todd (26 years ago, 31-Jan-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.technic.bionicle?
|
|
(...) Ah yes. Goodo. --Todd (26 years ago, 31-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Search Syntax Help Needed
|
|
I need help searching through articles on LUGNET!! How do I specify that I want to search for an exact phrase? Do I enclose the phrase in quotes or parentheses? Something else? Can I look up articles by specifying a date? If so, how do I do that? (...) (26 years ago, 31-Jan-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | lugnet.technic.bionicle?
|
|
These guys are causing quite a stir, and discussion about them, their CD-ROM, and the website has sprung up in many different groups. Might they warrant their own newsgroup to keep it in one place? I know Slizer/Throwbots and Roboriders don't have (...) (26 years ago, 31-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: CLSOTW sidebar menu
|
|
(...) Okie dokie, ya...good point. --Todd (26 years ago, 31-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | CLSOTW sidebar menu
|
|
Todd, The sidebar listing of CLSOTW sites is getting awfully long. Since 2001 has rolled around, maybe it's time to archive everything from 2000 like you have for every other year? Also, the past picks pages still use the old (1999) formatting. I (...) (26 years ago, 31-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Stick in the mud...
|
|
(...) Yes. ++Lar (26 years ago, 31-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Help
|
|
(...) Yes, but I'm behind... --Todd (26 years ago, 31-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Stick in the mud...
|
|
(...) I wonder if this was the IE trailing-/ issue that ++Lar was referring to last week. (...) It's too bad it was there in the first place, but I'm glad to hear it's no longer an issue for you. --Todd (26 years ago, 31-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Help
|
|
Do i get a card? :) (...) (26 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Help
|
|
(...) thanks todd, all mighty lego man! (26 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Help
|
|
(...) I can help you. Hang on... --Todd (26 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Help
|
|
I am a member, i did not receive any notification when my check arrived at LUGNET H.Q., I did not receive a card listing/stating my password and membership like i have seen. I did not receive a password. All i know is that i have my own little page (...) (26 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Password?
|
|
odd & All, (...) do you get your original password at? If I have it, I don't know of it. That is my stumbling block! Scott S. -- (...) ***...*** Please visit (URL) (26 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Password?
|
|
(...) (URL) (26 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | LUGNET Password?
|
|
Todd & All, I was looking into doing some things that LUGNET had to offe,r but I can't seem to remember how to get / change my password to LUGNET. I am a member, so what do I need to do? Any help is greatly appreciated! :) Scott #227! S. -- (...) (26 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Stick in the mud...
|
|
Thanks for fixing this, Todd. One annoyance in Internet Explorer is that the history captured in the Address text box does not keep the trailing slash. So, even if I typed the slash by hand once, if I use the down-arrow to save typing and go to the (...) (26 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Stick in the mud...
|
|
(...) OK, it's now fixed. It wasn't as easy as I'd hoped, but what I kluged up is plenty safe. Now, if you now type in the URL without the trailing slash: (URL) will silently auto-forward you to the correct URL: (URL) for if you type it in wrong by (...) (26 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
