To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 8818
8817  |  8819
Subject: 
Lugnet.lego.direct and its charter
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Sat, 10 Feb 2001 22:45:27 GMT
Viewed: 
214 times
  
After reading the .lego.direct charter, I was unclear if this message
http://news.lugnet.com/lego/direct/?n=1854 was appropriate for the group.
Further digging led to http://news.lugnet.com/lego/direct/?n=6 where I
concluded that message #1854 was not appropriate due to its use of a
"tabloid-like" tone.

I have no quarrel with good, thought-out complaints, but IMO (and as far as
I can tell about Lugnet in general), a subject line like "Lego's Dirty
Trick" has no place in such a group, and it is ultimately self-defeating to
the community, especially when it's the .direct group. I found the message
to be reactionary and completely negative, despite what the author might
think about how it might spur TLC onto more productivity. If I were in a
position of reading .direct posts for TLC, posts like that would make me
think that the group was not mature enough for primetime.

Given the tenuous state of the AFOL relationship with TLC, could
.lego.direct's charter be enhanced/clarified to include the spirit of the
group found in message #6?

-Tom McD.
when replying, who put the spam in the spamma-lamma-ding-dong?



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Lugnet.lego.direct and its charter
 
(...) Hmm... after reading (URL) maybe my idea ain't such a good one. Oh well... it's just a bunch of plastic toys. What was I thinking anyway? :-P -Tom McD. when replying, to avoid non-stickage, use Pam on your spam. (24 years ago, 10-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
  Re: Lugnet.lego.direct and its charter
 
(...) I'd like to know about this as well. The signal-to-noise ratio is just too low in that group now. I've resigned myself to avoiding the thing completely as it now seems to be a complete waste of bandwidth. About all I find there is bickering (...) (24 years ago, 16-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)

3 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR