Subject:
|
Re: Space stations?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Sat, 8 Jan 2000 03:19:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
6422 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Patrick Leahy writes:
> HEY! What's going on? Why does a space station have to be some butt-ugly
> assembly of modules? I think a space station, ship, etc. should be designed
> and built as a single unit. It looks so much better that way, and it works
> better that way too.
Butt-ugly eh? :) I hope I provide more inspiration for newsgroup fodder for
years to come! (And he's only seen 4 out of dozens of configurations.)
And BTW, when referring to ugliness, some folks might not be able to take it,
so using "IMO" in such statements can work wonders. But personally, I don't
give a yak's booger about whether people think my stuff is ugly or not.
-Tom McD.
when replying, once upon a time spamcake was used to weigh down coffins buried
at sea.
The San Francisco Bay Area Users Group
http://www.baylug.org
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Space stations?
|
| (...) Say Tom? Is your space station powered by those new spamcake fusion fuel cells that NASA Is developing ? <g> John (24 years ago, 8-Jan-00, to lugnet.space)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Space stations?
|
| HEY! What's going on? Why does a space station have to be some butt-ugly assembly of modules? I think a space station, ship, etc. should be designed and built as a single unit. It looks so much better that way, and it works better that way too. Z (24 years ago, 7-Jan-00, to lugnet.space)
|
94 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
