Subject:
|
Re: Space stations?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Fri, 7 Jan 2000 21:15:09 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
MATTDM@MATTDM.antispamORG
|
Viewed:
|
6129 times
|
| |
|
|
Z <leahy@concentric.net> wrote:
> and built as a single unit. It looks so much better that way, and it works
> better that way too.
Works better how?
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Space stations?
|
| (...) While modules aren't designed for any particular setup, the space stations designed and built as one unit are designed so that certain components function with certain other components. Such specific design results in a better functioning (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jan-00, to lugnet.space)
| | | Re: Space stations?
|
| Well, I built a starship bridge, I still have it somewhere, and it took so much space for what I wanted, I can't imagine a space station I would like to build (I think of station McKinley from ST) Sometimes, you have to build only what your bricks (...) (24 years ago, 10-Jan-00, to lugnet.space)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Space stations?
|
| HEY! What's going on? Why does a space station have to be some butt-ugly assembly of modules? I think a space station, ship, etc. should be designed and built as a single unit. It looks so much better that way, and it works better that way too. Z (24 years ago, 7-Jan-00, to lugnet.space)
|
94 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
