Subject:
|
Re: Space stations?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Fri, 24 Sep 1999 20:37:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5332 times
|
| |
|
|
On Thu, 23 Sep 1999 13:57:42 GMT, "Duane Hess" <DNJHESS@ZDNETMAIL.COM>
wrote:
> I haven't built a fully working model yet, but have played with the mating
> slopes on either side of the door. I found that to get a good mate between
> the two sides, the female portion must be one plate taller than the male. In
> doing so, the alignment of the hole/pin is thrown off by 1/2 a plate.
Oops. Erg. This is not easily resolved. Drat. The indented/extended
portions could be changed to use bricks and tiles, instead of slopes. Or
we could keep the surfaces flat, like the M3 port.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Space stations?
|
| (...) My vote is for the flat faced design. It generally takes up less room and (I think) is easier to incorporate into a design. Have you tried using a 2 x 1 x 1 panel instead of the 1 x 1 w/ headlight and tile design? I vaguely (sp) remember using (...) (25 years ago, 24-Sep-99, to lugnet.space)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Space stations?
|
| (...) I haven't built a fully working model yet, but have played with the mating slopes on either side of the door. I found that to get a good mate between the two sides, the female portion must be one plate taller than the male. In doing so, the (...) (25 years ago, 23-Sep-99, to lugnet.space)
|
94 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
