To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 7734
7733  |  7735
Subject: 
Re: Ldglite bug report (Was: Portable Ldraw system)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Sun, 25 Aug 2002 03:19:32 GMT
Viewed: 
2223 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dev, Travis Cobbs writes:
You might find the following info from Microsoft's help page on glGet useful:

GL_LINE_WIDTH_RANGE
The params parameter returns two values: the smallest and largest supported
widths for antialiased lines. See glLineWidth.

That's the first I'd heard about it, but I looked it up when you mentioned
there was a limit.  One thing about OpenGL is that you can query for most of
the limitations.

Yeah, I knew about that.  I've also heard some hardware opengl drivers
have a max width of 1.  I was kinda hoping nobody would notice.  I
mean 20 pixel wide lines?  Who needs that much?  Perhaps Sproat can
enlighten us on what he plans to do with that super-magnified image.
I'm kinda curious if the 6400x4800 image came out.  I don't think I
ever made one that big.

Don



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Ldglite bug report (Was: Portable Ldraw system)
 
(...) You might find the following info from Microsoft's help page on glGet useful: GL_LINE_WIDTH_RANGE The params parameter returns two values: the smallest and largest supported widths for antialiased lines. See glLineWidth. That's the first I'd (...) (22 years ago, 24-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)

63 Messages in This Thread:
















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR