Subject:
|
Re: Ldglite bug report (Was: Portable Ldraw system)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Sat, 24 Aug 2002 23:22:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
6063 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Don Heyse writes:
> I also noticed that the opengl drivers seem to top out their wide line
> support at less than 12 pixels. Nuts.
You might find the following info from Microsoft's help page on glGet useful:
GL_LINE_WIDTH_RANGE
The params parameter returns two values: the smallest and largest supported
widths for antialiased lines. See glLineWidth.
That's the first I'd heard about it, but I looked it up when you mentioned
there was a limit. One thing about OpenGL is that you can query for most of
the limitations.
--Travis Cobbs (tcobbs@REMOVE.halibut.com)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Ldglite bug report (Was: Portable Ldraw system)
|
| (...) Yeah, I knew about that. I've also heard some hardware opengl drivers have a max width of 1. I was kinda hoping nobody would notice. I mean 20 pixel wide lines? Who needs that much? Perhaps Sproat can enlighten us on what he plans to do with (...) (24 years ago, 25-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Ldglite bug report (Was: Portable Ldraw system)
|
| (...) I applied the fix Travis pointed out, and it seems to smooth out some of the bumpies in antialiased mode with wide lines on my PC. Give it a try: http:\\ldglite.sourc...e_test.zip I also noticed that the opengl drivers seem to top out their (...) (24 years ago, 24-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
63 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
