To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / *775 (-100)
  M-Peedy page now up
 
M-Peedy is now up to .2 beta... it has checking/dialog boxes to prompt before overwriting the .MPD file you are creating, or any .DAT files it is extracting... DL it at: www.flash.net/~onyx/...peedy.html let me know what problems arise, and what you (...) (26 years ago, 18-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Parts
 
(...) If no one is into that effort already, yes it would be nice :-) The part is somewhat similar to the 3651 Technic Connector, but fits axles on both ends. Thanks! Laurentino Martins [mailto:lau@mail.telepac.pt] [(URL) (26 years ago, 18-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: M-Peedy version .1 beta
 
(...) .DAT (...) the (...) proggy (...) This is probably a good thing. If I have a model using unofficial parts, then to share it with the world as an .MPD, I would want the unofficial part to be added as a sub-model. Otherwise I'd have to inline (...) (26 years ago, 18-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Parts
 
(...) I posted the file as a follow-up to your request, but I did the Followup-to header incorrectly -- I pointed my reply to *just* lugnet.cad.dat, instead of *both* lugnet.cad and lugnet.cad.dat. My apologies. (...) Must be us part authors are (...) (26 years ago, 18-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Adriano Aicardi's e-mail address wanted
 
(...) From 3649.dat: 0 Author: Adriano Aicardi 1998 (ike@money.it) Don't know if this is still correct. Leonardo (26 years ago, 18-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Adriano Aicardi's e-mail address wanted
 
does anyone have Adriano Aicardi's e-mail address? (26 years ago, 18-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Parts
 
(...) what part are you talking about? is it like the technic connector but with an axle hole? i can build that for you if you really want it. it would only be very beta/mockup but it would be usable. let me know if you want me to make it. (26 years ago, 18-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: [makelist] mklist v1.1
 
Wow Lars, version 1.1 really is a leap forward. Steve and Lars already reported that Mklist.exe works on Win95b, Win98 and NT4.0. I'm pleased to report that it also works on MS DOS 6.2. Are there any other platforms Mklist should be tested on ? (...) (26 years ago, 18-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  M-Peedy version .1 beta
 
Okay... i've got the first test of my .MPD merger/splitter up... nothing fancy.. i'll get the interface, error checking, etc out of the way... right now i just want a testable copy of the parse routines to create/split .MPD files out there... give (...) (26 years ago, 18-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: MPD format
 
(...) Option (2) is the better choice. Option (1) will be a META command, specifically I believe "0 INCLUDE foo.dat" will be the syntax. (...) Anything other than a comment will be an error. The presence of comments will be accepted, but no META (...) (26 years ago, 18-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: How much is too much?
 
(...) basically the rule of thumb i try to stick with, is the basis for our point of origin primitive... the stud.. the standard LDraw stud uses a 16-segment cylinder... so whenever possible i try to use 16-sided cylinders anytime i'm dealing with a (...) (26 years ago, 18-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  How much is too much?
 
A short while ago Onyx produced a MAX2DAT converter which seemed like such a good idea I was inspired to look into converting from other text based formats. I chose VRML files to start with because they seemed very much alike to the DAT format. (...) (26 years ago, 18-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: small ufo saucer hulls
 
(...) whoa.. what an image that conjures up (stretching skin over the framework) wild, man ..joseph g (26 years ago, 17-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Parts
 
(...) (Was I expected to guess that someone have answered my mail in a different newsgroup?) I was not expecting that with so much people using LDraw not to find such common TECHNIC parts that that are available since last year (at least?). I know I (...) (26 years ago, 17-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Parts
 
(...) steve bliss posted this part to CAD.DAT earlier this week: (URL) (26 years ago, 17-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: [makelist] mklist v1.1
 
(...) Steve (26 years ago, 17-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Parts
 
I've posted this in lugnet.cad and nobody answered me, so I guessed I must have posted it in the wrong newsgroup... In LeoCAD I can't find some parts that are common in the newer TECHNIC sets. Is LeoCAD list complete or is outdated? I find very (...) (26 years ago, 17-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  RE: MPD format
 
Just to sum things up: Paul Gyugyi wrote (1): (...) and in another posting (2): (...) I think (1) and (2) are contradicting. I agree with (2). The functionality of (1) should be obtained with a META command. (...) Do we agree that valid drawing (...) (26 years ago, 17-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  RE: [makelist] mklist v1.0 ready for testing
 
(...) I have developed it on Windows 98, and tested it on NT 4.0 too. /Lars (26 years ago, 17-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: [makelist] mklist v1.0 ready for testing
 
BTW, I tried mklist under Windows 95, and it works fine. Has anyone tried it on Windows 98? Having a working makelist to include in a near-future parts update would be greate. Steve (...) (26 years ago, 17-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: [makelist] mklist v1.1
 
Great! Your message just crossed my mail wining for this. I'm going to try it out this evening. -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: Lars C. Hassing <lch@ccieurope.com> Aan: lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com> Datum: woensdag 17 (...) (26 years ago, 17-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: [makelist] mklist v1.0 ready for testing
 
Hello Lars, Are you still developping your mklist program for making the parts list ? I liked the program because it runs on both my MS-DOS 6.2 machine at home, and the (new and fast) Windows NT 4.00 based machine at work. I can't test it, but your (...) (26 years ago, 17-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  [makelist] mklist v1.1
 
New in v1.1: 1) sort by number if descriptions are the same 2) non-ascii sort to let 3005.dat come before 3005-a.dat 3) SkipTilde-question and Duplicate-check changed to options (try -h) in order to make mklist function like James's makelist. 4) (...) (26 years ago, 17-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: MPD format
 
(...) I think it's OK to load an MPD as a parts library in order to search parts in there, rather than in the usual directories. But I hope you agree that the well-known semantics of "1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 parts.dat" should not be changed to (...) (26 years ago, 17-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Our Modeling Future. (Was:Feature requests for LDraw/LEdit v. 2)
 
(...) ACCKK!!.. sorry gyug!!!.. actually it was Paulo Caparica Junior who wrote DAT2DXF... (just can't resist giving you credit for the super whacky-hacky proggies we have in our midst).. please excuse the misinformation J (26 years ago, 17-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  [Part] 6575 Technic Cam
 
it's too big to post to CAD.DAT... but it's finished... Terry said a great many people had been requesting it... so mail me and i'll shoot a copy to anyone who requests it J (26 years ago, 17-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Our Modeling Future. (Was:Feature requests for LDraw/LEdit v. 2)
 
Don't confuse your names; I did not write the DAT2DXF program, I think that might have been Paul Evans Bauch (spelling?). I don't have ACAD, but I use DXF files as a common file format. The registered version of AC3D includes source for a DXF (...) (26 years ago, 17-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: MPD format
 
(...) I'm thinking of the case where foo.dat only appears in the MPD file fooarchive.dat, such as would happen if someone replaced the whole P directory with a single MPD file to save disk space, or if I chose to distribute my unofficial Throwbot (...) (26 years ago, 17-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: LDLite 1.7 suggestions
 
(...) That's what I would think... Since it is already checking for Z-ordering, I could Force a backwards redraw by manually re-ordering the lines in the DAT file... and then I could nip off and shoot me-self :) But I don't see why LDLite couldn't (...) (26 years ago, 17-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: LDLite 1.7 suggestions
 
(...) You could draw using the normal algorithms, right? You'd just have to step through the main file backwards, one line at a time. BTW, great idea, Karim! --Bram Bram Lambrecht / o o \ BramL@juno.com ---...---oooo-----(_...o---...--- WWW: (URL) (26 years ago, 16-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: small ufo saucer hulls
 
Steve Bliss wrote in message <36ee61f9.2510929@lu...et.com>... (...) all (...) and (...) Oh, well, I can certainly understand that. I can't help you find them, but if you want to dump them to me I JUST LOVE to organize things. Hey I've got a whole (...) (26 years ago, 16-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Feature requests for LDraw/LEdit v. 2
 
Steve Bliss wrote in message <36ee613a.2319642@lu...et.com>... (...) ACAD comes in several flavors. The industrial strength ACAD is a monster, but it can handle just about anything you can think of in a CAD. For those who may not need all the bells (...) (26 years ago, 16-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Feature requests for LDraw/LEdit v. 2
 
(...) Going back to the question of new line-types in LDraw2, if we had all the curved-surface types, there would be little or no use for the Type-5 line, as long as we could specify that a specific object should be outlined/edged. Or have separate (...) (26 years ago, 16-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  OpenGL/Perl Modeller
 
Okay, this is my second posting (the first was to lugnet.cad) about PerlLD which is my little Perl/Tk/OpenGL modeller. You can use it for creating & viewing complete models but my intent is to use it to make parts (loading gets slower as the size of (...) (26 years ago, 16-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Our Modeling Future (Was: Feature requests for LDraw/LEdit v. 2)
 
(...) i see the good *and* the bad in the .DAT format... i like the idea that the same parsing routines handle everything from the model down to the line type... all transformations can be uniformly applied to every sub element, element, part, and (...) (26 years ago, 16-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: MPD format
 
On Tue, 16 Mar 1999 07:24:08 GMT, Paul Gyugyi <paul@gyugyi.com> wrote: [snip] Just a short post, to say "I agree!" Steve (26 years ago, 16-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: small ufo saucer hulls
 
(...) I have way to much stuff, in various stages of abandonment, to just dump it all on the 'net. Even if that 'net is lugnet. Besides, I'd have to both find and organize it first. ;) Steve (26 years ago, 16-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Technic "Throwbot" or "Slizer"?
 
In Australia, I have some sets in the 1998 LEGO catalogue - I haven't received this year's catalogue yet - that are in a category known as Competition. In this catalogue, are listed numbers 8223, 8202, 8266, 8257, and 8245. All of these throw either (...) (26 years ago, 16-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Feature requests for LDraw/LEdit v. 2
 
(to jump in, or to stay out. Decisions, decisions. Oh, what the heck.) Why wait for LDraw2 to come up with better ways to produce part-files? It would be *great* if LDraw2 can handle multiple source-file formats, but that's a different issue. I (...) (26 years ago, 16-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Feature requests for LDraw/LEdit v. 2
 
(...) Yes. (...) And you still need a simple representation of a POV part to be able to use it in an modeler. /Lars (26 years ago, 16-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Technic Cam 6575
 
(...) it "Catch Cross" in LDraw. How about: "Technic Connector with Axlehole" And how about the number? Do anybody know what it is? Fredrik (26 years ago, 16-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: MPD format
 
(...) Yes, I agree. But MPD is not very parser-friendly. You read the file and half-way down it says: "Oh, by the way, I'm an MPD!" How are you supposed to avoid complaining about garbage lines before the first "0 FILE" without parsing each file (...) (26 years ago, 16-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: LDLite 1.7 suggestions
 
(...) Great! I just ran into another problem. The "Continuous" checkbox in the Options does not work. I wanted to view Karim's AT-AT and have it auto-rotate, but quickly found that the continuous feature wouldn't work. -- Terry K -- (26 years ago, 16-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: MPD format
 
(...) While I appreciate the LDAO modeler, I find it awkward to use. It is a good effort at making an ad-hoc modelling tool, but leaves a lot to be desired. So I use it only occasionally. For large models, I prefer LEdit, imperfect as it is. -- (...) (26 years ago, 16-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Problems with LDAO, L3PAO
 
(...) If you are using LDAO 1.4..5 try this: Make a backup copy of your ldraw.ini file in /windows. Then open the primary ldraw.ini file and find the [Categories] section. Delete all entries in that section. Save the file and try running Make (...) (26 years ago, 16-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Feature requests for LDraw/LEdit v. 2
 
The *strength* of LDRAW is the Type 2 and Type 5 lines. They are key to making rendered instruction sheet output look good. AC3D is a modeller that supports both triangles and lines, with POV and DXF output. I encourage you to check it out at: (URL) (...) (26 years ago, 16-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: MPD format  [DAT]
 
I think valid drawing lines before the first "0 FILE" of an MPD file should not be allowed (comments and garbage lines are OK). Either it is an MPD file, or it is not. If valid drawing lines are encountered first, well, here's an example of what (...) (26 years ago, 16-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: LDLite 1.7 suggestions
 
OK: Stop button is officially on the TODO list. A backwards redraw would be nice, but I don't see an easy way to handle it in the code. The LDAO modeler can be useful here: you can set it up to only draw lines that are highlighted in the editor, or (...) (26 years ago, 16-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Our Modeling Future. (Was:Feature requests for LDraw/LEdit v. 2)
 
(...) it was paul gyugi who mentioned the shareware proggy i spoke of... here's his original post: (...) meshes in DXF format, as well as his writing the DAT2DXF converter)... so he will be a great source of information on what other avenues we may (...) (26 years ago, 16-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: To lugnet administrator.
 
(...) Actually, there is a special group lugnet.off-topic.test for this sort of thing. :) (...) This is correct -- it's not a bug. If your e-mail program has a Reply-to-All feature, simply use that when replying to messages instead of the plain (...) (26 years ago, 16-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: small ufo saucer hulls
 
Steve Bliss wrote in message <36ed2452.8871338@lu...et.com>... (...) Just like any good predator, I'm willing to devour any prey, be it, embryo to the infirm. And just like our feline and canine friends, I will even take prey that I may never use. (...) (26 years ago, 16-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Feature requests for LDraw/LEdit v. 2
 
I totally agree, we should find a public or freeware CAD program to do the mundane for us in modeling. I also agree that finding something we can all agree on would be monumental task. I would love to be able to use MAX output ( as I've previous (...) (26 years ago, 16-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  To lugnet administrator.
 
Sorry if this is off-topic, but I just found out how to set my news program to this group. Thought I'd try this as a means of replying to the emails, instead of through the mailing list, since it doesn't set the reply-to properly - my mail prog (...) (26 years ago, 16-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  m:tron
 
someone said a while ago that they had .dat files of every m:tron set except the secret space voyager. can i please have them? (26 years ago, 16-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: small ufo saucer hulls
 
steve, can i please have the 1 x 2 x 2? also how close to complete is your octogonal offset? i want a mockup version if possible. (26 years ago, 15-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Problems with LDAO, L3PAO
 
(...) Yes, I recently ran makelist2 (i think it's 2). The new pieces are in LEdit's catalog, but LDAO can't seem to find them. --Karim (26 years ago, 15-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Feature requests for LDraw/LEdit v. 2
 
personally, i think we should look to a public-domain modeling tool for the basis of our meshes in LDraw2... (i'd *prefer* we all just use MAX, but i know that isn't possible for obvous reasons)... my point in this is that we need a tool that does (...) (26 years ago, 15-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: LDLite 1.7 suggestions
 
(...) Oh, Yes! I'd love a stop button. While we are making suggestions, I have a really wild one: Backwards Redraw. There are, I'm sure, technical difficulties involved in this, but it would be soooo nice if implemented well. Basically, I see this (...) (26 years ago, 15-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: MPD format
 
(...) i understand... and i too prefer the win apps... that's why i'm writing some of them for the community... and i believe wholeheartedly that we should abandon the original LDraw and LEdit completely at some point, once the proper replacements (...) (26 years ago, 15-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Feature requests for LDraw/LEdit v. 2
 
(...) hehe.. in 3DS it's called "A-B subtraction" or "B-A subtraction".. and those are *intense" routines to write... he he.. damn, everyone just needs 3DSMAX.. J (26 years ago, 15-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: LDLite 1.7 suggestions
 
(...) i second that... a stop feature would also help when using the -T option... some models won't let me close the LDLite window while rotating.. i have to go into Task Manager to get LDLite to stop... J (26 years ago, 15-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Technic Cam 6575
 
(...) i'm on it J (26 years ago, 15-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: star wars wings
 
You could, but I haven't opened anything but the 7150 TIE-Fighter/Y-Wing. And that doesn't have the big new wing plates. Steve (...) (26 years ago, 15-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: star wars wings
 
They're not out here :-( I made the rounds yet again this weekend to no avail. I could send what I've got so far to Steve, if he wanted to finish it. All that's left to do is the side-wall along the angled side. -John Van jonathan wilson wrote in (...) (26 years ago, 15-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Ldlite suggestions
 
(...) Arg, you're right. My bad. Thanks for the bug info! Cheers, - jsproat (26 years ago, 15-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: L3PAO Suggestion
 
(...) John Bauman wrote: (...) I don't have much experience in handsome backgrounds. I can however add some hooks, i.e. some #include directives, at strategic places in the POV file. If you can supply some cool backrounds, I can make them available (...) (26 years ago, 15-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: MPD format
 
(...) L3P will treat an MPD file in a Type 1 line exactly as it treats an MPD file as the main file (top-level file). L3P's nature is recursive. An MPD file is just another way of storing sub-files. In stead of loading sub-files from the usual (...) (26 years ago, 15-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: MPD format
 
L3P uses this state-machine: Initial state is HEADER. ____Type of input line_____ Oldstate Bad line 0 FILE valid HEADER HEADER MPD DAT MPD E+MPD MPD MPD DAT E+DAT W+MPD DAT E: Skipping bad line W: LDraw commands preceded this 0 FILE This pragmatic (...) (26 years ago, 15-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Feature requests for LDraw/LEdit v. 2
 
(...) POV-Ray calls it DIFFERENCE. /Lars (26 years ago, 15-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Feature requests for LDraw/LEdit v. 2
 
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> Aan: lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com> Datum: maandag 15 maart 1999 16:03 Onderwerp: Re: Feature requests for LDraw/LEdit v. 2 (...) I've seen a solid (...) (26 years ago, 15-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: MPD format
 
Ooopppps, I guess that's where a winking smiley would come across better. Ledit and ldraw are pretty good, I do prefer ldlite and ldao modeler, though. Easier to use special views and maneuver in. I just like a windows interface better, though I (...) (26 years ago, 15-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  chrome/aluminum/silver
 
(...) TLG called it Silver last year. --Todd (26 years ago, 15-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: MPD format
 
(...) Don't forget that in an MPD, anything before the first 0 FILE should be ignored (on the assumption it's notes from the author, and e-mail message, or something similar). Steve (26 years ago, 15-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Problems with LDAO, L3PAO
 
(...) Have you run Makelist lately? This function creates a new parts.lst file, which will include the new parts. The Make Catalog function depends on parts.lst. Steve (26 years ago, 15-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: small ufo saucer hulls
 
(...) I've had it, in very draft form, for quite some time. If someone is interested in picking it up from me, to at least finish mocking-up, let me know. Otherwise, I could at least add the rest of the studs, and some skin, and send it to Joseph. (...) (26 years ago, 15-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: what is wrong with my parts?
 
Jonathan, My view of releasing 'official' parts for LDraw is that it is both a service to the online LEGO community, and it is an on-going memorial to James Jessiman. I have looked at a lot of James' parts, and there are many errors, inaccuracies, (...) (26 years ago, 15-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Feature requests for LDraw/LEdit v. 2
 
(...) Hollow, solid, or tube-shaped? I'd also like to see discs, arcs, spheres and cones. And some spline-thingy, I suppose. How about boolean operators? INTERSECT, UNION, and whatever's the proper term for "All of A that's outside of B". Steve (26 years ago, 15-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: MPD format
 
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: John Bauman <jtb86@ptdprolog.net> Aan: lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com> Datum: maandag 15 maart 1999 1:00 Onderwerp: Re: MPD format (...) On top of what Onyx said, there is also a very (...) (26 years ago, 15-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  star wars wings
 
john, can you please make any changes needed to the star wars wings now that the star wars sets are out... (26 years ago, 15-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Technic Cam 6575
 
i plan to possibly make a draft of the catch cross and will put it on my site: (URL) keep checking there and it should be up sometime in the near future. (26 years ago, 15-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: SW colors & parts
 
(...) It's in the FAQ: Orange LDraw: 462 Tan LDraw: 382 Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) -- ---...--- LDraw FAQ: <URL:(URL) (26 years ago, 15-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: MPD format
 
(...) Wouldn't it be enough to put a call to my MPD builder [1] on the menu in LDAO? Steve, will you do that in the next release of LDAO? Feel free to include the MPD builder in your distribution. Play well, Jacob [1] <URL:(URL) ---...--- -- E-mail: (...) (26 years ago, 15-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: LDLite 1.7 suggestions
 
(...) I would like to chime in here too. F5 refresh would be nice. Especially since v. 1.6 no longer does what 1.5 used to do; In 1.5, when the model was done rendering, you could sele Option|View and hit Enter to redraw the model. Now, you have to (...) (26 years ago, 15-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Technic Cam 6575
 
(...) Sorry, no. This part, along with the one called "Catch Cross" in Jim Hughes' index are my most wanted too. Fredrik (26 years ago, 15-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Technic (Throwbot) Leg with Ball Joints
 
(...) I'm just thinking that this name may be confused with the Technic figures, as they have legs, too. Adding "Slizer" after "Technic" will clear this up. Fredrik (26 years ago, 15-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Ldlite suggestions
 
I've started making the first and last line of my work-in-progress be 0 TRANSLATE x y z [...] 0 TRANSLATE END where x,y, and z are offsets. If I get tired of that, I'll make mouse drags in the LDLite window change the offset values, unless someone (...) (26 years ago, 15-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: L3PAO Suggestion
 
(...) sorry, but your last post has me a little riled.. i'm not lars' secretary... if you run L3P or if you spend time on these boards, then you have the resources available to access his email address ... you can hand any suggestions to him (...) (26 years ago, 15-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: MPD format
 
(...) at the risk of invoking some unnecessary animosity.. i feel the overwhelming need to ask that you NEVER.. *EVER* make a comment like that again.. i refer specifically to the "might as well scrap that and the ldraw junk" portion... i don't know (...) (26 years ago, 15-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  LDLite 1.7 suggestions
 
hey gyug... recently we spoke about implementing F5 refresh into LDLite... here are a few other ideas that have popped up over the last few days while authoring parts... since we probably all have come up from our roots in LEdit... i often find (...) (26 years ago, 15-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Ldlite suggestions
 
(...) you may not be aware... but you can go to Options|Options in LDLite (1.6) and set the X and Y offset to move your model in LDLite render space... -X values will move the model to the left, +X to the right... -Y values move the model up and +Y (...) (26 years ago, 15-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  SW colors & parts
 
What is the best color # to use for tan and also the orange which are in the SW sets. Also the 3x3 plate corner used on the front of the landspeeder, is this a new piece or has it just not been made yet, I can't find it? Also John vZ if you are (...) (26 years ago, 15-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: L3PAO Suggestion
 
Also pass along the idea the have special options for default backgrounds ,such as snow, grass, and space. onyx wrote in message ... (...) keep (...) suggestion (...) itself... (...) one (...) (26 years ago, 14-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  (canceled)
 
 
  Ldlite suggestions
 
After doing a lot of virtual building over the past few days I noticed that sometimes in Ldlite a part of the model would be cut off down in the blh corner even though there was plenty of room in the urh corner area. For the next version would it be (...) (26 years ago, 14-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: MPD format
 
That is all there is to it. "0 FILE name.dat" starts a subfile. The subfile ends when end-of-file or another "0 FILE name.dat" line is reached. By convention, tools like L3P and LDLite, when given an mpd file, will render the first subfile. The (...) (26 years ago, 14-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Technic (Throwbot) Leg with Ball Joints
 
I've avoided using Throwbot/Slizer in the name, using just "Technic Leg with Ball Joints 3 x 7 x 1" The piece is stamped with "32173" -gyug ps. "Slizer" is better sounding than "Throwbot". (...) (26 years ago, 14-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
 
(...) agreed again... my point being that TLG *may* use different element numbers to differentiate between certain parts in different colors (perhaps not 1x2 bricks) but that our concern should only be separate part numbers when the physical makeup (...) (26 years ago, 14-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
 
(...) ^^^...^^^ Agreed, except that in the case of the 1x2 brick -- there are two molds still in use today: one with a post down the center and one without. The one without the post is of course the one used for little windows -- like in (...) (26 years ago, 14-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: Technic (Throwbot) Leg with Ball Joints
 
Fredrik Glöckner skrev i meddelandet ... (...) understand (...) I think it's called Slizer in all the world, except the US (?) -- Anders Isaksson, Sweden BlockCAD: (2 URLs) (26 years ago, 14-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  MPD format
 
who is governing the specs on the MPD format??? i'm thinking of writing a quick little MPD merger/splitter VB app... (seems whacky that we don't have one already)... and i just need to know the spec on what MPD's entail... all i can really see is (...) (26 years ago, 14-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more | 100 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR