Subject:
|
Re: Feature requests for LDraw/LEdit v. 2
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Tue, 16 Mar 1999 13:50:41 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1007 times
|
| |
|
|
(to jump in, or to stay out. Decisions, decisions. Oh, what the heck.)
Why wait for LDraw2 to come up with better ways to produce part-files?
It would be *great* if LDraw2 can handle multiple source-file formats, but
that's a different issue.
I promise to go check out ACAD, just as soon as I have time.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Feature requests for LDraw/LEdit v. 2
|
| Steve Bliss wrote in message <36ee613a.2319642@lu...et.com>... (...) ACAD comes in several flavors. The industrial strength ACAD is a monster, but it can handle just about anything you can think of in a CAD. For those who may not need all the bells (...) (26 years ago, 16-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Feature requests for LDraw/LEdit v. 2
|
| personally, i think we should look to a public-domain modeling tool for the basis of our meshes in LDraw2... (i'd *prefer* we all just use MAX, but i know that isn't possible for obvous reasons)... my point in this is that we need a tool that does (...) (26 years ago, 15-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
