Subject:
|
Re: Parts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 18 Mar 1999 12:59:08 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
796 times
|
| |
|
|
On Wed, 17 Mar 1999 23:14:25 GMT, Laurentino Martins <lau@mail.telepac.pt>
wrote:
> Thank you for leting me know :-)
> (Was I expected to guess that someone have answered my mail in a
> different newsgroup?)
I posted the file as a follow-up to your request, but I did the Followup-to
header incorrectly -- I pointed my reply to *just* lugnet.cad.dat, instead of
*both* lugnet.cad and lugnet.cad.dat. My apologies.
> I was not expecting that with so much people using LDraw not to find
> such common TECHNIC parts that that are available since last year (at
> least?).
Must be us part authors are spending too much time making part files, and not
enough time building. I know I tend to make files for (a) whatever happens to
come into eyesight (often in new sets I get) and (b) looks either easy or
interesting to model.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Parts
|
| (...) (Was I expected to guess that someone have answered my mail in a different newsgroup?) I was not expecting that with so much people using LDraw not to find such common TECHNIC parts that that are available since last year (at least?). I know I (...) (26 years ago, 17-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
