Subject:
|
Re: MPD format
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Wed, 17 Mar 1999 06:50:32 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
685 times
|
| |
|
|
"Lars C. Hassing" wrote:
> Paul Gyugyi wrote:
> > If things work that way, we would also need your meta command
> > "0 LOADCACHE parts.dat" to load part libraries in without drawing the
> > first subfile.
>
> Go ahead, if you feel the need for loading part libraries. In my L3
> project I just retain parts in memory once loaded. I wouldn't waste
> time on preloading parts no-one needs.
> /Lars
I'm thinking of the case where foo.dat only appears in the MPD file
fooarchive.dat, such as would happen if someone replaced the whole P
directory with a single MPD file to save disk space, or if I
chose to distribute my unofficial Throwbot parts as a single MPD
to better maintain artistic control.
-gyug
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: MPD format
|
| (...) Yes, I agree. But MPD is not very parser-friendly. You read the file and half-way down it says: "Oh, by the way, I'm an MPD!" How are you supposed to avoid complaining about garbage lines before the first "0 FILE" without parsing each file (...) (26 years ago, 16-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
