Subject:
|
Re: The Official "Issues List"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.ambassadors
|
Date:
|
Tue, 31 Jul 2007 00:24:41 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
14135 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.ambassadors, William R. Ward wrote:
| |
In lugnet.ambassadors, Ted Godwin wrote:
| |
In lugnet.ambassadors, William R. Ward wrote:
| |
I concur. But the lack of such updates should not be interpreted as
victory. Just not enough work done on publicity.
|
Sure, but what I have been trying to say, apparently totally unsuccessfully,
is that you cannot start attacking the ambassadors because they did not make
it a current issue if the publicity work is so bad that someone like me
(reasonably informed and a regular visitor to this forum) can have the
impression that the line is no longer in imminent danger - even if that
impression is not correct.
OF COURSE there are still concerns and OBVIOUSLY there is more danger than I
was aware of but to describe the omission of 9V from the list of current
concerns as “galling” is just wrong. It is not the ambassadors fault it
dropped off the radar and now that it has been brought back to their
attention I would suggest people work on a new campaign of awareness/action
rather than ragging on the ambassadors who should be allies in this fight,
not targets.
|
I guess I just expected that the ambassadors would make it their job to know
what the top issues are for the LEGO community without us having to nag them.
|
Well, community members have been repeatedly raising all the other issues on
the list...
So, should we ignore them and put saving 9V trains to number 1 regardless of
what community members are actually bringing to our attention and asking us to
follow up?
I guess we could, but that strikes me as being arrogant in the extreme: “Lots of
community members came to us with this list of complaints, but they don’t really
know what’s important, so we put this other issue straight to the top of the
list”.
I’m not sure that sort of approach would be terribly well received, either.
Cheers
Richie Dulin
LEGO Ambassador
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: The Official "Issues List"
|
| (...) I just took a look at the current list (from (URL) right?) and I think there is a good reason to place 9V ahead of all of those issues: If none of those issues are addressed by LEGO, there is no change. If the 9V trains issue is not addressed, (...) (17 years ago, 31-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: The Official "Issues List"
|
| (...) I guess I just expected that the ambassadors would make it their job to know what the top issues are for the LEGO community without us having to nag them. (17 years ago, 31-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
87 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
