To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.ambassadorsOpen lugnet.ambassadors in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Ambassadors / 206
205  |  207
Subject: 
Re: The Official "Issues List"
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.ambassadors
Date: 
Tue, 31 Jul 2007 00:07:17 GMT
Viewed: 
13708 times
  
In lugnet.ambassadors, Ted Godwin wrote:
   In lugnet.ambassadors, William R. Ward wrote:
   I concur. But the lack of such updates should not be interpreted as victory. Just not enough work done on publicity.

Sure, but what I have been trying to say, apparently totally unsuccessfully, is that you cannot start attacking the ambassadors because they did not make it a current issue if the publicity work is so bad that someone like me (reasonably informed and a regular visitor to this forum) can have the impression that the line is no longer in imminent danger - even if that impression is not correct.

OF COURSE there are still concerns and OBVIOUSLY there is more danger than I was aware of but to describe the omission of 9V from the list of current concerns as “galling” is just wrong. It is not the ambassadors fault it dropped off the radar and now that it has been brought back to their attention I would suggest people work on a new campaign of awareness/action rather than ragging on the ambassadors who should be allies in this fight, not targets.

I guess I just expected that the ambassadors would make it their job to know what the top issues are for the LEGO community without us having to nag them.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: The Official "Issues List"
 
(...) Well, community members have been repeatedly raising all the other issues on the list... So, should we ignore them and put saving 9V trains to number 1 regardless of what community members are actually bringing to our attention and asking us (...) (17 years ago, 31-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: The Official "Issues List"
 
(...) Sure, but what I have been trying to say, apparently totally unsuccessfully, is that you cannot start attacking the ambassadors because they did not make it a current issue if the publicity work is so bad that someone like me (reasonably (...) (17 years ago, 30-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)

87 Messages in This Thread:



































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR