Subject:
|
Re: The Official "Issues List"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.ambassadors
|
Date:
|
Mon, 30 Jul 2007 06:24:19 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
12053 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.ambassadors, Timothy Gould wrote:
| |
In lugnet.ambassadors, Ted Godwin wrote:
| |
If a site dedicated to this cause has nothing to say on the subject for four
months I think we can cut the ambassadors a little slack if they did not
include it in their current issues list.
|
If you would like to see more people needlessly complaining I’m sure that can
be arranged. Perhaps Save9VTrains should have a message on the front page
requesting that people kick up a fuss regularly.
|
Well, saving 9V trains does seem to be the purpose of the site, so short of a
“Mission Accomplished” posted prominently on the site, I think it’s reasonable
to assume that the saving of 9V trains remains a concern of the site and its
community.
| |
I don’t think that any website should be responsible for constantly rehashing
the same issue. Ambassadors should.
|
Noted.
Cheers
Richie Dulin
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: The Official "Issues List"
|
| (...) Your original post seemed to imply to me that you a) considered 9V trains to be saved and b) did this because you had seen no further information on the issue (which I perhaps mistakenly thought meant from TLG as opposed to from secondary (...) (17 years ago, 30-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
87 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
