Subject:
|
Re: The Official "Issues List"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.ambassadors
|
Date:
|
Mon, 30 Jul 2007 15:46:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
13305 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.ambassadors, William R. Ward wrote:
| |
I concur. But the lack of such updates should not be interpreted as victory.
Just not enough work done on publicity.
|
Sure, but what I have been trying to say, apparently totally unsuccessfully, is
that you cannot start attacking the ambassadors because they did not make it a
current issue if the publicity work is so bad that someone like me (reasonably
informed and a regular visitor to this forum) can have the impression that the
line is no longer in imminent danger - even if that impression is not correct.
OF COURSE there are still concerns and OBVIOUSLY there is more danger than I was
aware of but to describe the omission of 9V from the list of current concerns as
“galling” is just wrong. It is not the ambassadors fault it dropped off the
radar and now that it has been brought back to their attention I would suggest
people work on a new campaign of awareness/action rather than ragging on the
ambassadors who should be allies in this fight, not targets.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: The Official "Issues List"
|
| (...) I guess I just expected that the ambassadors would make it their job to know what the top issues are for the LEGO community without us having to nag them. (17 years ago, 31-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
87 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
