To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 12220
12219  |  12221
Subject: 
Apologies (was Re: Timeout
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 21:35:34 GMT
Viewed: 
5557 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, Ondrew Hartigan wrote:

Larry’s so called bad joke was insulting to me, as well as

(some, but apparently not all)

other NILTC members.
Now I know ken could care less about an apology from Larry personally but that's
not the point. The apology needs to be aimed towards the club it's self since
Larry insulted the group as a whole.

I'm sorry that some members of NILTC took offense at my joke. In particular,
Ondrew, I am sorry that you took offense. It is regrettable. I may not
necessarily think it's reasonable to take offense so, but that doesn't matter,
you've stated you were offended and I apologise.

I'm not privy to the internal structure, or lack thereof, of the NILTC. If it
has structure, and an officer or official representative contacts me asking for
an apologhy, I'll be happy to compose a more formal apology to the club as a
whole, and that officer or official representative can forward it on via their
internal commmuncations mechanisms.

If, on the other hand, NILTC does not have formal structure, if there are other
members of the club that took offense that have not yet made themselves known,
they are welcome to contact me personally and I will apologise to them as well.

As to the library, I suspect no one from the library is even aware of this
issue. However if there are library personnel that are offended, they too are
welcome to contact me and I will apologise to them as well.

Hopefully that would be sufficient to terminate this part of this thread.



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Apologies (was Re: Timeout
 
(...) Larry, if you're so busy dealing with Lugnet issues (URL) I would suggest the quickest resolution would be to just apologise "to anyone that may be offended" in the original thread. ROSCO (19 years ago, 24-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
  Re: Apologies (was Re: Timeout
 
(...) THANK YOU . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. (19 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Timeout (was Re: "Some pigs...")
 
Now I understand that ken is bullheaded and may have justly received this timeout however I do agree that an apology is in order. Larry’s so called bad joke was insulting to me, as well as other NILTC members. Now I know ken could care less about an (...) (19 years ago, 24-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)

71 Messages in This Thread:

























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR