Subject:
|
Re: "Some pigs are more equal than other pigs"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sun, 23 Jan 2005 04:50:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3772 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman wrote:
> > In lugnet.admin.general, Ken Nagel wrote:
> > > No, but divulging personal info without permission is obviously a
> > > violation of TOU
>
> Assuming the information is "personal" rather than "common knowledge".
That wasn't for you to decide.
> I'm not sure what Ken means here, some elaboration might be helpful. What is it
> that I've been picky about, exactly? And how does my being "picky" correlate to
> the assertion that this was an "obvious attack"?
“I can't imagine him messing up this spectactularly."
> Up until this incident, I had no idea Ken bore me any animosity whatever.
Up untill you felt the need to screw with a public invitation and further can't
take responsibility for your actions I felt no animosity.
> He has stated his affiliation with LEGO Brand Retail in the past, on what I
> consider a public group (chicago-lego@groups.yahoo.com), many times. Never, to
> the best of my recollection, was there any statement by him on that group or
> elsewhere that he wanted that kept confidential. Hence, I would characterise
> that affiliation was "common knowledge".
Again what was done in a small group of friends and aquantences is one thing and
again it wasn't your decision to make.
> I'm not sure I agree that it's a valid feeling because the circumstances, in my
> view, don't support the notion that there was a privacy violation.
"Some pigs are more equal than other pigs."
>
> Further I'm not sure it's appropriate that he should *want* to keep his
> affiliation a secret.
Did I mention that it wasn't your decision to make? Without regard when it takes
this much for an ADMINISTRATOR to explain and justify away his actions something
is broken.
Ken
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: "Some pigs are more equal than other pigs"
|
| (...) Assuming the information is "personal" rather than "common knowledge". (...) I'm not sure what Ken means here, some elaboration might be helpful. What is it that I've been picky about, exactly? And how does my being "picky" correlate to the (...) (19 years ago, 23-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
71 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
