Subject:
|
Re: Timeout (was Re: "Some pigs...")
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 16:16:57 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5533 times
|
| |
|
|
-snip-
Thank you for giving us the perspective of NILTC. Up until now, Ken has been
speaking on behalf of a number of people (NILTC and the Library) - and I've been
curious on their take on this.
> OnDrew
> Former founding member of the NILTC.
Does this mean you are no longer a member? No longer a founding member? I'm
confused.
> p.s. what ever happened to freedom of speech?
What exactly do you think has violated freedom of speech? Ken was given a
timeout for "The many personal insults and excessive crossposting." Lugnet has
never guaranteed freedom of speech, especially if you refuse to follow the ToS.
Aside from Ken being given a timeout for failing to follow the ToS, I fail to
see where "freedom of speech" has been compromised.
I'd go so far to say that by allowing this thread to happen, Lugnet has [proven]
its committment to a 'no censorship' policy.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Timeout (was Re: "Some pigs...")
|
| Now I understand that ken is bullheaded and may have justly received this timeout however I do agree that an apology is in order. Larry’s so called bad joke was insulting to me, as well as other NILTC members. Now I know ken could care less about an (...) (20 years ago, 24-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
71 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
