Subject:
|
Re: Timeout (was Re: "Some pigs...")
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 01:27:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
6301 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Leonard Hoffman wrote:
| |
| |
| |
Are you asking as an official representative of NILTC? I’m just asking to
make sure it’s understood that you’re speaking for NILTC in this instance.
|
techicly i’m not an official represenitive anymore since i’m no longer an
active member. however since i created the club along with tim courtney and
brian willams i still retain the right to protect my investment. so yes in
this instance i am speaking on behalf of the club.
|
“On behalf” is different than being a representative of the club. I know
through personal communications that Tim Courtney was not offended by Lar’s
post.
|
tim isin’t a member anymore and hasn’t been involved for close to 2 years.
| |
I’m still curious about how the club feels.
|
then ask them! niltc@niltc.org
the only reason they haven’t replyed to this allready is because they are tired
of all of the ranting and other B.S. that goes on this site. i’ve only replyed
because i have been involved from the begining when i emailed larry telling him
that his joke was an insult.
| |
| |
just an f.y.i.
when larry posted his “bad joke” i private mailed him about it and pointed
out that he had insulted the club even if unknowingly. the only responce i
got was in regards to it being a joke.
|
I hope you realize that the Admins have been particularly busy this past week
and a half dealing with Lugnet issues - Lar especially as someone has
publically slandered him(1).
-Lenny
(1)= Ken accusing Lar of being the rationale for Ken’s termination.
|
i don’t care about how busy the admins have been. it’s not my problem. besides
that ken only got fired after larry made a point of using ken’s employment
aginst him. whether the 2 were related, i don’t know but it shouldn’t have been
done. it’s just bad judgement.
ondrew
p.s. if you want to private mail me go for it but i’m done. i will not be
posting anymore on lugnet on this subject.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Timeout (was Re: "Some pigs...")
|
| (...) That's true, Ondrew, the large amount of time that LUGNET has required from the admin team lately is not your problem. Unfortunately, when issues that have been dealt with (as this one has been) are reopened with repeats of insinuations and (...) (20 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Timeout (was Re: "Some pigs...")
|
| (...) "On behalf" is different than being a representative of the club. I know through personal communications that Tim Courtney was not offended by Lar's post. I'm still curious about how the club feels. (...) I hope you realize that the Admins (...) (20 years ago, 24-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
71 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
