Subject:
|
Re: "Some pigs are more equal than other pigs"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sun, 23 Jan 2005 05:26:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3881 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> > In lugnet.admin.general, Ken Nagel wrote:
> > If you missed them go back and re-read the previous postings.
>
> Do me a favour and explain it again for me, because I have read the previous
> postings, and I didn't see what the specific consequences of this asserted
> privacy violation were. We're going really slowly here to make sure that there
> is no possibility of any misunderstanding.
Again the facts have been posted multible times It's a waste of time to repost
them.
> > It's pathetic that you can carry on with this and feel you have any credibility
> > as a Lugnet administrator.
>
> You are certainly entitled to that opinion. But it doesn't actually demonstrate
> what you're asserting, it's just a pejorative attack, and doesn't help resolve
> this issue.
Apparently there is nothing that can help. The facts have been laid out several
times. All you want to do is obfuscate the facts and parse the words. Yes it is
my opinion it probably is an attack but you are demonstrating in a grand grand
way that “Some pigs are more equal than other pigs”.
Ken
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: "Some pigs are more equal than other pigs"
|
| (...) Do me a favour and explain it again for me, because I have read the previous postings, and I didn't see what the specific consequences of this asserted privacy violation were. We're going really slowly here to make sure that there is no (...) (19 years ago, 23-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
71 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
