 | | Emails not being answered
|
|
This is an absolute terrible way to come out of lurk mode, so first, I'll apologise if this is in any way appropriate. I've tried private emails, but haven't received any replies. I've been a regular reader of Lugnet for many, many years. Just this (...) (20 years ago, 7-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
A community explodes and implodes all at once. Hi, my name is Devin Michel. I've been with this gig for 5 going on six years. I'm a lurker. I feed without mercy on the achievements of such larger that life names as Palmer, Soren, Clague, Sophie and (...) (20 years ago, 7-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: contacting me via e-mail
|
|
(...) done. thanks for the reminder. -Suz (20 years ago, 7-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: And now for something complete different (a.k.a Let's help Rene design the future of LUGNET)
|
|
(...) Ooo! Really? I had no idea... Bring on the pics, Rene! ;-) (...) That's what I was afraid of. (rolling my eyes) Sounds like Rene will need a video conference for dealing with you then, eh? ;-) -Suz (20 years ago, 7-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: And now for something complete different (a.k.a Let's help Rene design the future of LUGNET)
|
|
(...) Seriously tho, anyone who has met Rene in person knows he is a fine specimen of a man. He's got that silky smooth blond hair, that innocent-but-actually-dirty look in his eye, and the cool, calm demeanor that just makes you want to do just (...) (20 years ago, 7-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: And now for something complete different (a.k.a Let's help Rene design the future of LUGNET)
|
|
(...) Oh my goodness Lenny, just ask him for the date already, and don't forget to bring the chocolates and flowers. Seriously, what does that mean, has a new admin team been set up already? Janey "Red Brick" (20 years ago, 7-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general) !
|
| |
| | Re: And now for something complete different (a.k.a Let's help Rene design the future of LUGNET)
|
|
(...) I think René probably meant *he* would not comment now, but file away all other comments. But I could be wrong. ROSCO (20 years ago, 7-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: And now for something complete different (a.k.a Let's help Rene design the future of LUGNET)
|
|
(...) Just a slight bit of clarification... Rene, are you asking us not to reply to this thread, or are you saying that the Lugnet Plan page won't be updated. I'm a little confused, sorry. Also, am looking forward to working with you in the future! (...) (20 years ago, 7-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
Hi. I signed up just to say. Blaaa blaaa blaa blaaa ok now lets build some lego stuff. (20 years ago, 6-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
(...) Hi Jan-Albert, WAM, did I missed out on something (1000steine)? Do you talk about the professional moaners? They're like Trolls and so they should be handled: Just ignore them, they will make a fool of themself anyway. If they get personal, (...) (20 years ago, 6-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: And now for something complete different (a.k.a Let's help Rene design the future of LUGNET)
|
|
(...) Hi Dustin, thanks for starting this. Though I'd prefer to leave it uncommented at this stage, I'll store all ideas and suggestions in my virtual shelves ;-) Leg Godt! René (20 years ago, 6-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
(...) So am I. Well I can't say what has been on LUGNet 6 years ago, but I do agree that it shouldn't be a place for such treatment. Marco (20 years ago, 6-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: contacting me via e-mail
|
|
(...) Could you add those to the Admin.general sidebar too? Thanks for keeping us up-to-date on your contact information. -Lenny (20 years ago, 5-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | contacting me via e-mail
|
|
I heard from Todd that there's been a problem with our e-mail forwarding. This is being corrected but, for the time being, be sure to include non-lugnet addresses such as: suz(at)baseplate.com or minifig(at)mac.com when contacting me. those are (...) (20 years ago, 5-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general) !
|
| |
| | Re: clarification
|
|
(...) I don't intend to continue using that site for discussion. It was mainly intended for the period of time leading up to an announcement on LUGNET and at BrickFest which ended like this: (URL) Rumor was that you had decided against giving Lugnet (...) (20 years ago, 5-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: And now for something complete different (a.k.a Let's help Rene design the future of LUGNET)
|
|
(...) Hi, Thank you for starting this constructive thread. Today, LUGNet satisfy all my needs, taking into account other websites offer services and I wouldn't appreciate too much radical changes (but I don't think that's what you're talking about). (...) (20 years ago, 5-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: And now for something complete different (a.k.a Let's help Rene design the future of LUGNET)
|
|
(...) Great thread idea! Personally, I'd really like to see some of the more common features of other message board systems, especially: - Seeing a list of all the things I've posted before - Subscribing to threads via email - More easily editing (...) (20 years ago, 5-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: And now for something complete different (a.k.a Let's help Rene design the future of LUGNET)
|
|
(...) I'd like to see LUGNET leverage the power of member-created webpages. Right now, members can setup FTX-based webpages. I just made one tonight, displaying some (URL) new LDraw colors> (not a stellar example, but it was handy). But these pages (...) (20 years ago, 5-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | And now for something complete different (a.k.a Let's help Rene design the future of LUGNET)
|
|
Let's start a thread to help define what we would like LUGNET to evolve into...to update the LUGNET Plan. First of all, if you haven't read the plan, check it out... (URL) lot of the focuses in the plan have been implemented to some degree by many (...) (20 years ago, 5-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Child-like behavior
|
|
First, I apologize if I am not posting this message in the correct arena. I'm kind of new to this type of thing. I have been reading various negative comments regarding Lugnet and its administration. I believe there is a perceived lack of discipline (...) (20 years ago, 4-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general) !
|
| |
| | Re: Bloviate (was Re: Warnings( was: WAKE UP!))
|
|
David Koudys wrote: (snip) (...) and you get no sleep (...) (snip) (...) its ALWAYS a good time for PYRO!!! :) Chris www.ThePyroGuys.com (20 years ago, 4-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Bloviate (was Re: Warnings( was: WAKE UP!))
|
|
(...) I've been there. If I may expound a little-- Having about 30 cubs running around your ankles at a cub camp on a weekend when it's rained the entire time and the kids are miserable, and you get no sleep 'cause you have to chase down the (...) (20 years ago, 4-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, C. L. GunningCook wrote: <snip> (...) You go girl! Janey always makes me happy :) Dave K (20 years ago, 4-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Bloviate (was Re: Warnings( was: WAKE UP!))
|
|
(...) Hi Jake! I didn't make the point as clear as maybe I should have. I'll try to keep it concise-- Constructive criticism = good Example-- "Maybe we should think about enabling a new message interface so we can put pictures and stuff in our (...) (20 years ago, 4-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: clarification
|
|
(...) I didn't miss it. However, you haven't post here or on your (URL) blog> since August. Rumor was that you had decided against giving Lugnet to Rene, and that was backed up by seven months of silence. Part of making a decision is following (...) (20 years ago, 4-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Warnings( was: WAKE UP!)
|
|
(...) I do indeed understand. Another issue, especially with the long absense of Adminship, is to restore the feeling that there is law and order. That happens with people seeing consequences. If Eric had just suddenly stopped posting, there would (...) (20 years ago, 4-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Warnings( was: WAKE UP!)
|
|
(...) Another question: Assumming the rules are stated and understood by all, and "sentences" are fairly standardized, need non-admins be informed of the duration of something like a time-out? I worry about this because I don't want to see people (...) (20 years ago, 4-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Warnings( was: WAKE UP!)
|
|
(...) Yes. When it comes to mechanics, I see this as the only way. It simplifies the process, avoids potential chaos and builds respect for the authority. But that doesn't mean the admin need not be influenced by, say, an outcry from the people. (...) (20 years ago, 4-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Warnings( was: WAKE UP!)
|
|
(...) This is a difficult question to answer in specifics. I'm tempted to re-word your question from, "Should admins disregard.." to, "Should admins consider.." which makes it an easy: "Yes." LUGNET users' voices are always counting for something, (...) (20 years ago, 4-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
(...) Thanks Suz, Sorry to have to dump this here, it just keeps coming up over and over, and I felt it should be addressed. In happier news, I hope once the Lugnet dust settles, you enjoy your well deserved break, and I hope to see you, at a fest, (...) (20 years ago, 4-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
(...) Cheers to you both for doing your own thing and for doing it well. I see JLUG as an example of some natural evolution within a community. There was a need for a bar to hang on, and you built it. bravo. -Suz (20 years ago, 4-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | clarification
|
|
Some people seem to think I'm in the midst of a decision. Jake, Lenny and others have refered to "making up my mind" or somesuch about what to do with the website. Perhaps those people missed what I said here: (URL) recently I said that there's been (...) (20 years ago, 4-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
(...) JLUG - The Inherent Evil Agenda?(1) With the on going comments, I refuse to sit idly and watch the same ppl that told us to get our own place now complain that we have. I must say, I find the criticism of JLUG absolutely hilarious. JLUG was (...) (20 years ago, 4-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX) !!
|
| |
| | Re: Bloviate (was Re: Warnings( was: WAKE UP!))
|
|
[snip] David, you rock. I admit it: I'm a wuss. I need handholding to do a job I don't like. And over the years it was often YOUR posts and private mails that got printed out and (literally) posted on my refridgerator to get me through the more (...) (20 years ago, 4-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
Gee! I thought that we were here because of Legos. What a batch of wachoes. You all need to take some prozack, that is a drug given to bad behaved children. Get back to the basics, legos. What a bunch of trash for the younger members to see. You all (...) (20 years ago, 1-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Bloviate (was Re: Warnings( was: WAKE UP!))
|
|
(...) That's not quite a good analogy. A government is imposed upon you. LUGNET is a free service that you use (yes, I know there are memberships, but they're structured more like donations). It's sort of like complaining about, say, Google or (...) (20 years ago, 4-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Bloviate (was Re: Warnings( was: WAKE UP!))
|
|
(...) Personally, I don't think that's fair. That's the same thing as telling people who disagree with a governmental policy in a certain country to like it or leave it. That doesn't benefit anyone - things only get better when people standup and (...) (20 years ago, 4-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Bloviate
|
|
(...) I agree, admins that can't be trusted or don't behave for the good of their community are problematic. I belong to at least one message board (not LEGO-related) where a good deal of the above applies. I don't post there often. But if you're (...) (20 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Bloviate (was Re: Warnings( was: WAKE UP!))
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Kelly McKiernan wrote: <snip> (...) There are a few more things that warnings, proper adminship and the like are contingent on-- That the admins are not a bunch of bloviating blowhards (that leaves me out of the admin (...) (20 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
(...) Did I say "to me"? If you actually take the time to actually investigate that site[1], you'll find the little mocking that occurs happens *after the fact*, so I don't really think "staging area" is a very accurate description. But whateva. 1. (...) (20 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
(...) I'm surprised the mockers are so mysterious to you. Don't they have their own (URL) staging area> and everything? *shrug* -Tim (20 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
(...) I agree with Jake and Lenny. Conversely to Jake's statement, I think that people do think less of you when you don't allow change to happen by holding onto the reigns and not encouraging people who are willing to lead and empowering them by (...) (20 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Warnings
|
|
(...) My expectation is that they're considered, but not as meaningful as admin warnings. If Howard was warned 50 times by other members, and once by an admin, but Harold was only ever warned once by an admin for the same violations; it seems that (...) (20 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Warnings( was: WAKE UP!)
|
|
(...) In my experience, mod/admin decisions should be made based on official warnings rather than peer recommendations, which may be biased or incomplete. For instance, having 5 people say "Don't do that" about something is not as effective as a (...) (20 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Warnings( was: WAKE UP!)
|
|
(...) Actually, that raises another question. Should admins disregard advice/warnings given by others (non-admins and admins in non-admin role) in making decisions about timeouts/bans? Seems to me they should count for something, though exactly how (...) (20 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
(...) Did you just bash AOL users and abbreviate people to "ppl" in the same sentence? Seems contradictory to me. Maybe we should be the solution, not the problem? --Kyle (URL) (20 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
(...) Only after it spins out of control do you listen. The abuse that you "endure" is brought upon yourself. Have you ever gone back to read what you've written? Some of it is cool and encouraging, but the vaste majority is pure non-sensical, (...) (20 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
(...) I'm curious, is any action being taken against those who have been baiting Eric? I absolutely agree that Eric has committed TOS violations, but the degree of baiting that he has been subject to has no place on Lugnet, or at least would have (...) (20 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general) !!
|
| |
| | Re: Alternatives to Lugnet? Was: Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
(...) If you stop by (URL) my blog>, a ways down on the right hand side I have a listing of community sites, many of which have forums. None of these is all encompassing, like Lugnet in its prime - most of them focus on a particular theme (e.g. (...) (20 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
(...) Yeah, I am also a curator in dot mecha. I've been keeping things current. (Eric and I switched off updating as we were able to do so) Both Eric and I were looking for another person to help out with curator duties, Fradel asked if he could do (...) (20 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.curators, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Alternatives to Lugnet? Was: Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
(...) Unfortunately, I don't think Eurobricks adequately fills the void left by LUGNET. LUGNET has enjoyed an older audience of AFOLs whose primary focus seems to be MOCing and displaying their works. Eurobricks on the other hand seems to cater to a (...) (20 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: What happened to the new servers?
|
|
(...) Thanks, Todd. Good to know it's alive and well and being utilized. James (20 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Alternatives to Lugnet? Was: Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
(...) Eurobricks is well run and has more than enough to keep most people posting with some fun. Rules are somewhat less strict and the admins are quick to take action against blatant spammers/offensive/trolls who won't behave. It doesn't have a TOS (...) (20 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: What happened to the new servers?
|
|
(...) The hardware has been set up and running in a powered rack on an active Internet connection; the software is 98% installed and we had most of it running at one point, but never got the last 2% to make the switch to the new OS. One of the boxes (...) (20 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.finance)
|
| |
| | Re: What happened to the new servers?
|
|
(...) Todd would be the one to answer this properly. I believe the hardware is set up, but not in use at present. I know the domain issue got resolved. For the switchover, we had yet to make arrangements with Rene about sending the hardware to (...) (20 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.finance)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
(...) Eric's curatorship privileges are temporarily suspended. I believe Mark Neumann is also a curator there and still has editing abilities, as do I, if anything special needs to be done in the meantime. -Suz (20 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.curators, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
<snip> (...) How does this affect his .mecha curatorship? (20 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: What happened to the new servers?
|
|
(...) Then I would like some clarification from someone who knows, so I X-posted to .finance. Have they or haven't they? James Wilson Lugnet member 1783 (20 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.finance)
|
| |
| | Re: What happened to the new servers? (Was Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!)
|
|
(...) As far as I know (back when the Admins resigned) the servers were waiting for something or another to happen. Some problem with the domain name or whatever. But no, the servers have not been brought into service. (Again, as far as I know, I (...) (20 years ago, 2-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general) !
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
(...) I agree with this 100%. Suz, despite what I may have said elsewhere, I have immeanse respect for you and especially what you have done with Lugnet. But the time has come to make a choice one way or the other. -Lenny (20 years ago, 2-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
(...) I really think you need to internalise things and move on, Larry. Allister (20 years ago, 2-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
(...) Thank you for this Suz (and Todd?). I realise that it must have been a hard decision to make but I feel it was the right one under the circumstances. Tim To Eric, When I first posted in response to you my only intention was to get you to admit (...) (20 years ago, 2-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.people, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
(...) Eric Sophie has lost posting privileges as a result of ToS violations. -Suz (20 years ago, 2-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX) !!
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
It's really a shame to see that Lar's worst nightmare (which I hope what it was...) is really coming true... about a year ago I couldn't have been more happy reading Rene Hoffmeister of 1000steine taking over control of LUGNET. However both (...) (20 years ago, 2-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
(...) (URL) Eric, I really think at this point just admitting you were wrong and saying you're sorry would be the coolest thing to do. j o n (20 years ago, 2-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
(...) -snip- I dare say, you are one of the people who thinks its a joke what I go through. Only after it spins out of control do you say something. Never trying to help. Never taking seriously the abuse I endure. Your post mentions nothing of the (...) (20 years ago, 2-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Alternatives to Lugnet? Was: Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
(...) Oh... the other part of my response was going to be that I have my own server and my own fixed IP address and it's been tempting to start a site with the characteristics you listed. (20 years ago, 1-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Alternatives to Lugnet? Was: Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
(...) I like that last line. LEGOFan.org is one place. However, like LUGNET, it is currently flying without a pilot, and things that need to be fixed aren't getting fixed there either. Still, I enjoy some of the conversation over there. (20 years ago, 1-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Alternatives to Lugnet? Was: Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
(...) Yeah, uh, this is a little too much for me. One of the things that I love about lego is that I look forward to sharing this hobby with my kids someday. I would love to share an online community with them too, someplace where we can both get (...) (20 years ago, 1-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
(...) I debated and debated whether to post to this thread. I don't want anyone to think for a second that any of what I'm about to say applies in any sort of official, quasi-official, or post-official sorta way. What I'm about to say is my own (...) (20 years ago, 1-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general) !!
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
(...) warning: raging bile duct Yup. Living proof right here. The registering process is a pain, and due to the posting hassles I've posted a grand total of 8 posts on lugnet for the 2-or so years I've been registered here. No matter what you say (...) (20 years ago, 1-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
(...) and if I'm not, why keep kicking me when I'm down? It only makes the little I can do harder.. -Suz (20 years ago, 1-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
(...) So who (in your view) *IS* part of the solution? You've already said you don't think Todd & Suz are, or these mysterious mockers. Maybe a re-formed LPRC? Who would be the members, do you think? What other solution do you have? Maybe you think (...) (20 years ago, 1-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
(...) Well, I *am* pretty disillusioned at this point, so that's a valid (and astute) observation on your part. It's always sad to see something deteriorate, especially something that you invested considerable emotional capital(1) in making a (...) (20 years ago, 1-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
(...) OK. Makes (some kind of) sense now. Sorry for the nag, but you sounded so disillusioned in that post that I was actually wondering if it was the real Larry that had written it... (20 years ago, 1-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New group under Events for Brick Bash?
|
|
(...) Slickness. Thanks! (20 years ago, 1-Apr-06, to lugnet.events, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: I wonder ....
|
|
(...) I sent the emails to todd@lugnet.com, suz@lugnet.com and admin@lugnet.com. Jude (20 years ago, 1-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New group under Events for Brick Bash?
|
|
(...) Setting it up now... --Todd (20 years ago, 1-Apr-06, to lugnet.events, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: I wonder ....
|
|
(...) I didn't see it either. I'm supposed to be getting email to admin@lugnet.com, but I haven't seen any in a while. I think the procmail mechanism may still be broken. Are people still unable to post through the mail gateway? --Todd (20 years ago, 1-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New group under Events for Brick Bash?
|
|
(...) OK, thanks for the info. (20 years ago, 1-Apr-06, to lugnet.events, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: I wonder ....
|
|
(...) Thanks for actioning this request. Jude (20 years ago, 1-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New group under Events for Brick Bash?
|
|
(...) FTR, I've asked Todd repeatedly to take care of this. It's not something I can do. I'm sorry. -Suz (20 years ago, 1-Apr-06, to lugnet.events, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
(...) I believe Todd is taking action now. -Suz (20 years ago, 1-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: I wonder ....
|
|
(...) That was seriously inappropriate. I've canceled it. I'm sorry that I didn't see e-mail about it. Only Todd receives admin@lugnet.com. -Suz (20 years ago, 1-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: I wonder ....
|
|
(...) Tim, As discussed, I actually agree with you and ask someone with the authority to please delete (URL). I have sent emails to who I thought are the admins to deal with this (Todd, Suz and admin@lugnet.com) and have not received a response, (...) (20 years ago, 1-Apr-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
(...) Very true. However, whatever happens (or doesn't happen) with LUGNET in the future, I'll always be supportive of Todd and Suz. By the very fact that LUGNET is still here and we're still visiting and talking about LEGO in the various NG's is (...) (20 years ago, 1-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | What happened to the new servers? (Was Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!)
|
|
(...) Hmmm. Are you saying that the new servers that we community-fundraised for two years ago: (URL) never been brought into service? Kevin ---...--- Craftsman Lego Kits & Custom models: (URL) Lego parts store: (URL) Guild of Bricksmiths(TM): (URL) (...) (20 years ago, 31-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
(...) Aaron's post might prod Todd and Suz into actually doing something. My reply might prod them into not doing the things that didn't work last time. That seems helpful to me. Your mileage may vary, of course, but those who do not learn from (...) (20 years ago, 31-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
(...) Stupid question: In whatever way will that post help? (20 years ago, 31-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
(...) [snip] (...) LOL you forgot 2a) Update mental list of trolls. Maybe you should add ++Lar to your mental list after that effort. ROSCO (20 years ago, 31-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.general) !
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
(...) That's certainly one approach... Or... Find some other suckers (Frank, Lenny, Kelly, Tim and Lar having been used up already), form another transition team, tell them that this time you both REALLY mean it, that you're really going to let them (...) (20 years ago, 31-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.general) !!
|
| |
| | Re: New group under Events for Brick Bash?
|
|
(...) Anyone? Bueller? (20 years ago, 31-Mar-06, to lugnet.events, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
If Jon's text doesn't get the message across, check out the number of highlights his post received. I for one am sick of Lugnet and it's drama. It's not even worth posting my MOCs here anymore. Why should I even try, knowing that any post I make (...) (20 years ago, 31-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
(...) I thought about this post for quite sometime last night. I couldn't respond then because I was too angry. Sophie may be annoying, and he may even violate TOS on a regular basis. But the blatent abandonment of this community by its (...) (20 years ago, 31-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
Sorry, screwed up that link: (URL) -Keith (20 years ago, 31-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
(...) How is that "make lots of good posts about LEGO" thing working out? (URL) Look I realize I'm on shaky ground here, considering my posting history, but you're going to tell me you can't somehow get rid of this post? Or ban the person who posted (...) (20 years ago, 31-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
(...) Your error in judgement is thinking that ANY reply does anything to correct his behavior. I fully support Jon's call for Eric being banned. Not because of the constant annoying noise that we all know he is capable of. But the abusive, violent (...) (20 years ago, 31-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
(...) Wow. I think he broke almost all of those. Soren (20 years ago, 31-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
In lugnet.general, Jon Palmer wrote: ... (...) I refuse to get angry. It's bad for my health. But I understand why people are upset, believe me. I met with Todd last night regarding LUGNET. Currently, there isn't anything I can do about the (...) (20 years ago, 31-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Leonard Hoffman wrote: <snipage> (...) I think hurting e is less of an intention and more of a beneficial side effect of correcting his behaviour. ;-) Jude (20 years ago, 31-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
