| |
In lugnet.admin.general, Ross Crawford wrote:
| |
In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
| |
it is my
view that they are not part of the solution to LUGNET’s ills, no matter what
they may protest, or how much their supporters may snipe at me
|
So who (in your view) *IS* part of the solution? You’ve already said you don’t
think Todd & Suz are, or these mysterious mockers. Maybe a re-formed LPRC? Who
would be the members, do you think? What other solution do you have? Maybe you
think there is no solution? In which case, how can *ANYONE* be part of it?
ROSCO
|
I’m surprised the mockers are so mysterious to you. Don’t they have their own
staging area and everything?
*shrug*
-Tim
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
| (...) Did I say "to me"? If you actually take the time to actually investigate that site[1], you'll find the little mocking that occurs happens *after the fact*, so I don't really think "staging area" is a very accurate description. But whateva. 1. (...) (19 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
| (...) JLUG - The Inherent Evil Agenda?(1) With the on going comments, I refuse to sit idly and watch the same ppl that told us to get our own place now complain that we have. I must say, I find the criticism of JLUG absolutely hilarious. JLUG was (...) (19 years ago, 4-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX) !!
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
| (...) So who (in your view) *IS* part of the solution? You've already said you don't think Todd & Suz are, or these mysterious mockers. Maybe a re-formed LPRC? Who would be the members, do you think? What other solution do you have? Maybe you think (...) (19 years ago, 1-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
32 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
