Subject:
|
Re: Warnings( was: WAKE UP!)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 4 Apr 2006 07:23:01 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5637 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.people, Ross Crawford wrote:
| |
snip
Should admins disregard
advice/warnings given by others (non-admins and admins in non-admin role) in
making decisions about timeouts/bans? Seems to me they should count for
something, though exactly how they should be taken into account is not an
easy question to answer.
ROSCO
|
This is a difficult question to answer in specifics. I’m tempted to re-word your
question from, “Should admins disregard..” to, “Should admins consider..” which
makes it an easy: “Yes.” LUGNET users’ voices are always counting for something,
but I’m not sure it’s possible to define that in a quantitative way.
-Suz
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
| (...) Thank you for this Suz (and Todd?). I realise that it must have been a hard decision to make but I feel it was the right one under the circumstances. Tim To Eric, When I first posted in response to you my only intention was to get you to admit (...) (18 years ago, 2-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.people, FTX) !
|
42 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
