Subject:
|
Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.people
|
Date:
|
Sun, 2 Apr 2006 12:55:02 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
10142 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.people, Ross Crawford wrote:
> Hmmm, interesting to compare that view of Eric, who has shown a wilful
> disregard for the ToS, with <http://news.lugnet.com/admin/general/?n=12405
> your opinion of Jojo>.
I'm fairly sure Eric might try to off himself if his posting privileges were
permanently revoked. Dunno if that's the reason Larry is suggesting softer
treatment for a greater offense, but it's something to consider.
Soren
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
| (...) I see nothing inconsistent here. Eric should get an indefinite timeout until he requests cancels on the posts that clearly are over the line, acknowledges he erred and that the ToS does apply to him, and apologises for causing part of the (...) (19 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.people) !
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
| (...) Hmmm, interesting to compare that view of Eric, who has shown a wilful disregard for the ToS, with (URL) your opinion of Jojo>. (...) That would involve someone deciding what "completely inappropriate" is. But as you brought it up, which posts (...) (19 years ago, 2-Apr-06, to lugnet.people, FTX)
|
42 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
