Subject:
|
Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.people
|
Date:
|
Thu, 6 Apr 2006 18:12:36 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
!
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
10171 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.people, Marco Tagliaferri wrote:
| |
In lugnet.people, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
| |
Further, and just as importantly, I’d like to see some of the people who
responded completely inappropriately get some timeouts too.
But it’s not my place to say.
|
I’d absolutely sign this. The way of baiting on Eric (done by some members)
had nothing to do with a discussion on ToS violation. IMHO this is as
despicable as the ToS violation. Might be it is a ToS violation itself.
Sincerely
Marco
|
Is there a way to moderate LUGNET discussions and lock threads? It’s based on
USENET, right? That means no.
Most community forums have pretty good moderation systems where threads get
locked once they get off topic or become flame wars. I’d like to see LUGNET be
able to do this; of course, that kind of system is only as good as the
moderators who are keeping an eye on things.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
| (...) Well, I hope LUGNET doesn't start locking threads. I post sometimes on BZPower and it seems that my threads get locked a lot and I am never sure exactly why. It's happened enough times to make me not want to post there anymore - I guess I just (...) (19 years ago, 6-Apr-06, to lugnet.people, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
| (...) I'd absolutely sign this. The way of baiting on Eric (done by some members) had nothing to do with a discussion on ToS violation. IMHO this is as despicable as the ToS violation. Might be it is a ToS violation itself. Sincerely Marco (19 years ago, 6-Apr-06, to lugnet.people, FTX) !!
|
42 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
