Subject:
|
Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.people
|
Date:
|
Mon, 3 Apr 2006 11:17:55 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
10447 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.people, Timothy Gould wrote:
| |
--SNIP--
| |
I see nothing inconsistent here. Eric should get an indefinite timeout until
he requests cancels on the posts that clearly are over the line,
acknowledges he erred and that the ToS does apply to him, and apologises for
causing part of the ruckus... plus some (fairly sizable in his case)
definite amount as a reminder that he should not trifle. I would not support
a permanent irrevocable ban for Eric, at this time, because in the last
year, at least, he has not been previously warned. He should have been, but
he wasn’t.
|
As I mentioned the first response to Eric, he has in fact been
told before.
|
John’s not an admin. A PERMANENT ban would still be shotgun against puppy
without prior warning, IMHO. A temporary ban is what apparently has been imposed
though. (wasn’t very clear at first, still isn’t very clear although it is
somewhat clearer)...
As I said, I see nothing inconistent (w.r.t. Eric vis a vis Joho) in the
timeouts if Eric’s is as I outlined. (the lack of timeouts for certain others in
the thread, that’s inconsistent though)
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: Warnings( was: WAKE UP!)
|
| (...) Actually, that raises another question. Should admins disregard advice/warnings given by others (non-admins and admins in non-admin role) in making decisions about timeouts/bans? Seems to me they should count for something, though exactly how (...) (19 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| | | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
| (...) Nevertheless, if you read the rest of the thread, Eric did make a (URL) commitment of sorts> not to do it again. So he either willfully disregarded that, or simply forgot, when posting this latest auction. Either one doesn't fill me with any (...) (19 years ago, 4-Apr-06, to lugnet.people, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
| --SNIP-- (...) As I mentioned the first response to Eric, he has in fact been (URL) told before>. Tim --SNIP-- (19 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.people, FTX)
|
42 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
