To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.peopleOpen lugnet.people in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 People / 4566
4565  |  4567
Subject: 
Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.people
Date: 
Mon, 3 Apr 2006 18:33:59 GMT
Highlighted: 
(details)
Viewed: 
10359 times
  
In lugnet.people, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
  
As I said, I see nothing inconistent (w.r.t. Eric vis a vis Joho) in the timeouts if Eric’s is as I outlined. (the lack of timeouts for certain others in the thread, that’s inconsistent though)

Which “certain others”?

ROSCO



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
 
(...) John's not an admin. A PERMANENT ban would still be shotgun against puppy without prior warning, IMHO. A temporary ban is what apparently has been imposed though. (wasn't very clear at first, still isn't very clear although it is somewhat (...) (19 years ago, 3-Apr-06, to lugnet.people, FTX)  

42 Messages in This Thread:


















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR