 | | Re: [ldraw.org] Update
|
|
(...) Or something that's not any kind of a brick. Steve (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Update
|
|
Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:37bd5e73.642071...net.com... (...) What about the brick fading from outline to raytrace as the logo. That seems to me different enough from the LEGO uses of bricks, and it is certainly (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Update
|
|
So, why not change it to blue or yellow or any other color. That way we keep the brick, but let Lego keep their red 2xN bricks. Would this work?? I'd personally prefer the red, but if we want to avoid any problems with the red 2xN brick use changing (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Update
|
|
(...) Not contacting them is a simpler short-term solution. And it's one that is often used. I haven't asked them about the 2x3 brick icon used by LDAO, both as the program icon, and on the LDAO homepage. But calling inaction a "wiser solution" is (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Update
|
|
(...) Yeah, as much as I think this whole "trade dress" thing is silly, I agree 100% with Todd right here. Don't get me wrong - I LOVE ldraw.org - I love all the hard work that's gone into it. And maybe it's just the fact that I'm colorblind that (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Update
|
|
Tim: The new article on MLCad is good. I like the linking graphics, but Todd is correct in pointing out the potential problem. Since we can be sure TLG will see the site soon (if they haven't been there yet), we can just as well be polite and ask (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Update
|
|
(...) IANAL, so I may be way off base, but I wouldn't worry quite as much about that image, for several reasons: 1) It's got a blinking "Search..." on the side; it's not a static image of a brick. (Maybe that's not a significant difference.) 2) What (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Update
|
|
(...) And on that note, I just removed the red 2x2 LEGO brick that I used to have in the logo here: (URL) can't go around being a hypocrite! --Todd [followups to lugnet.publish] (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Update
|
|
(...) I guess you'd be pretty surprised at some of the legal questions I've asked TLG out of the blue then! :-) Maybe I'm just weird like that. (...) That doesn't help me worry about it any less. But again, maybe I'm just weird like that. (...) Hmm. (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Update
|
|
(...) Yeah, I saw that program and downloaded it and just had to write about it :) Mike fully cooperated with my efforts to promote it (I wonder why) ;) and is very open to suggestions for future features. (...) Though this may be a way of covering (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Update
|
|
(...) Awesome!!! (...) I'm starting to get worried that the bright red 2x3 brick appearing along the title of all the pages and appearing in all the linking images: (URL) cause confusion among average consumers and therefore concern at TLG. One of (...) (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | [ldraw.org] Update
|
|
I just updated the ldraw.org main page - adding an article about MLCad and a link to the new ldraw.org linking images. Check it out! -Tim Courtney ldraw.org Project Coordinator (URL) timcourtne ICQ: 23951114 (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting page for 9906
|
|
(...) Age, nothing. You've just written too many part files. ;) Steve -- It's all Bill Gates' fault. (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting page for 9906
|
|
(...) I agree with that. There are 8 parts which contain references to 4-4con12.dat: 6246A.DAT 6246B.DAT 6246C.DAT 6246D.DAT 6246E.DAT 751.DAT 755.DAT 104.DAT If no one minds, I'll change the 4-4con12.dat references in those parts to 4-4con1.dat, (...) (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting page for 9906
|
|
I did this to the two parts I created, and I got lots (and I mean *lots*) of lines that looked like this: WARNING "6056.DAT" Line 28: Bad vertex sequence, 0132 used: 4 16 16 144 6 16 140 6 -16 144 6 -16 140 6 What does this mean? Jeff (...) (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting page for 9906
|
|
How about: l3p -check -AUTHOR a9906 >c9906.txt I have reached the age I now can't recall which files are mine just by the file name... /Tore "Lars C. Hassing" wrote: <...> (...) <...> (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting page for 9906
|
|
Lars C. Hassing <lch@ccieurope.com> wrote in message news:57F1FE754246D21...@aarhus... (...) Not my part, but currently, I have a 4-4con12.dat in my /p directory, which I think should be renamed to 4-4con1.dat. (...) I checked this one, and in this (...) (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting page for 9906
|
|
(...) Me neither! But then again, I don't have any parts in this update. Duh. But I'd just like to say that using L3P to check a part is very convenient. Now that I know of the feature, I use it all the time when I model a part, not only just before (...) (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting page for 9906
|
|
On Thu, 19 Aug 1999 09:37:36 GMT, "Lars C. Hassing" <lch@ccieurope.com> wrote: [L3P report snipped] Yay! I'm not on the L3P error-list this time! Of course, I've only got one part in the update, and it's fairly simple. Steve (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | RE: Voting page for 9906
|
|
C:\> mkdir a9906 C:\> cd a9906\s C:\a9906> pkunzip a:9906part C:\a9906> mkdir s C:\a9906> cd s C:\a9906\s> pkunzip a:9906sub C:\a9906\s> cd .. C:\a9906> cd .. C:\> l3p -check a9906 >c9906.txt 19 files in a9906\S checked. 67 files in a9906 checked. (...) (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting page for 9906
|
|
I realize many authors have been away on vacations and may have missed these questions/comments. On some of these, I would like responses before I vote on them (even if the response is "what are you talking about?" 2500c01: I don't think the lights (...) (25 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting page for 9906
|
|
(...) Terry is responsible for the updates but he is away right now. As there wasn't any serious issues to be solved, it shouldn't take a lot of time to package everything but I can't say how long it's going to take because it depends on how much (...) (25 years ago, 14-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting page for 9906
|
|
Hey all. I'm new to this whole LDraw thing, and so don't know the timing of these things. How soon might the 9906 update be released to the rest of the world as an official update? Adrian (...) (25 years ago, 14-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting page for 9906
|
|
(...) Probably best if you just forget it then. --Todd (25 years ago, 11-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Finally Saw It!
|
|
(...) Thanks! :) (...) That was the intention, and the intention is to optimize the site for future additions of content. Glad you like! -Tim <>< (URL) timcourtne ICQ: 23951114 Rubber chickens are the best applied use of polystyrene to date. Get (...) (25 years ago, 10-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: ldraw.org Not Found
|
|
Adam, Thanks for the tips. Jacob has pinpointed the problem: (...) So a solution is being worked on. -Tim Courtney ldraw.org Project Coordinator (URL) timcourtne ICQ: 23951114 (25 years ago, 10-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: ldraw.org Not Found
|
|
Hi Tim, I tried something new today. (After seeing ldraw.org on my mom's comp at school I gained renewed interest in solving this problem.) I tried typing in the IP address to see if it would come up. It didn't. I also tried looking for several (...) (25 years ago, 10-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Finally Saw It!
|
|
Hi LDraw.org Team, I finally saw the site. (I had to use my mom's connection at school- Mindspring still won't let me through :( I thought it was excellent! You have done a great job putting it together. I liked all the links being in one place. And (...) (25 years ago, 10-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: ldraw.org Banner Ad
|
|
Very nice banner, Tim. Ryan "A lot of kids nowadays don't care if they die. They don't care where they're going after they die. But when you have Jesus Christ as your personal Savior, you know you have better things coming after you die." Russell (...) (25 years ago, 8-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | ldraw.org Banner Ad
|
|
I finally got off my butt and whipped up an ldraw.org banner ad. This ad is at the standard full size of 468x60 - a 400x40 (CLSOTW/LinkExchange) version is coming soon). Please send comments on the banner and feel free to place it on your site (...) (25 years ago, 8-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting page for 9906
|
|
John VanZwieten <john_vanzwieten@email.msn.com> wrote in message news:FFxzs5.Ivy@lugnet.com... (...) news:FFxE39.LM9@lugnet.com... (...) where (...) spheres used to model the "rivets" along the braces of (...) Ok. Now I understand. It shouldn't take (...) (25 years ago, 5-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting page for 9906
|
|
(...) ok. i will add a box on the bottom of the part. how bug (in ldu) whould i make it? i cant tell from looking at the part (...) will investigate this. didn't see that one (...) would the part be ok if i added the face of the clip only?also how (...) (25 years ago, 4-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting page for 9906
|
|
Jonathan Wilson <wilsonj@xoommail.com> wrote in message news:37A77C06.513643...ail.com... (...) missing The button is hollowed out on the back side, and has a box thing hanging from the bottom. These need to be modeled as the switch should be (...) (25 years ago, 4-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting page for 9906
|
|
Adam Howard <abhoward10@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:FFxE39.LM9@lugnet.com... (...) Poor use of a term of art (and poor use of geometry, too). I mean the 1/2 spheres used to model the "rivets" along the braces of the doors. -John Van (25 years ago, 4-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting page for 9906
|
|
John VanZwieten <john_vanzwieten@email.msn.com> wrote in message news:FFwpGz.86r@lugnet.com... (...) they meet the flat part of the door. I'm confused... Isn't this drawn when the stud2 primitive is called? Adam (25 years ago, 4-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting page for 9906
|
|
(...) things i know about: what exactly is missing fron the box and switch??? i cant see any details on the part that can be seen from the outside that are missing except the clip. i will add the rectangular face part of the clip to the lid part if (...) (25 years ago, 3-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting page for 9906
|
|
(...) Okay, I checked my canopies, and here is what I found: 2 are as John is describing. Very little fading from Dark to light gray, no gray line on the inside, etc. These correspond to my Y-wing sets. 6 are as I'm describing. Fade from dark to (...) (25 years ago, 3-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting page for 9906
|
|
Voting part comments: 2400, 6105: The 1/2 cylinder studs on the doors need 4-4edge.dat's where they meet the flat part of the door. 2500c01: I don't think the lights are done quite right here. There's a reference to a 4-4cone1.dat, but I don't have (...) (25 years ago, 3-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting page for 9906
|
|
(...) news:FFuFFw.Cr0@lugnet.com... (...) Ah. I didn't realize that. No problem then. (...) Really? I'll have to compare all of mine when I get home (I have 8). Don't forget to dither(?) the dark gray to light gray, please! :) I could deal with a (...) (25 years ago, 3-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting page for 9906
|
|
Jeff Stembel <Dragonelf1@aol.com> wrote in message news:FFuFFw.Cr0@lugnet.com... (...) The insertion point is the center of the cylinders. This makes it much easier to rotate on the z axis, and to rotate on the x axis then place in its vertical (...) (25 years ago, 3-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting page for 9906
|
|
(...) Well, in LDLite, it looks like there is a faded crosswalk when shading is turned on. It looks really bad, IMO. (...) Oops, my bad. Yes, I meant 609p01. Thanks for changing the color. Now it'll match the current road plates. Talkin' 'bout the (...) (25 years ago, 3-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Spline-generator
|
|
Hi, After experimenting a bit with the current tools for creating flexible parts I had a lot of problems to place and orientate the hoses using Bezier-curves. I've looked around a bit and found some examples using multi-point splines. Main different (...) (25 years ago, 3-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting page for 9906
|
|
(...) i would just like to say that i am prepared to admit that the roadplate parts probobly were not redy for voting on but on the 32 x 32 raised with ramp the mistakes on the corners and also the line in the pit were all honest mistakes. (25 years ago, 3-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting page for 9906
|
|
(...) i promise to fix the pit extra line asap.also about the corners... i can fix those as well. thanks for pointing out the mistake. (...) my mistake. i thought i could make this by changing the color of the grey bits on the dashed roadplate to (...) (25 years ago, 3-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting page for 9906
|
|
(...) OK. (...) That sounds cool! I've never used LDAO to edit anything before. Let me give it a try before I bug you with it. Thanks, Adam (25 years ago, 3-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting page for 9906
|
|
(...) [Snip] (...) If you use LDAO, open the file in the Editor, select the entire file, then click Edit | Move Exact. Type the distance to move in the Y box. Click OK. Save the file. If you don't LDao, I can do the edit for you... Steve (25 years ago, 3-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting page for 9906
|
|
Jeff Stembel <Dragonelf1@aol.com> wrote in message news:FFuFFw.Cr0@lugnet.com... (...) hinged (...) Yes, actually that wouldn't be a bad idea, but it would take me way too much time. When I originally submitted these doors back in Oct/Nov, they were (...) (25 years ago, 3-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: are idea book models going to be accepted into the omr?
|
|
(...) yeah. there were the blacktron II and mtron mega model set instructions... (25 years ago, 2-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: are idea book models going to be accepted into the omr?
|
|
Tim Courtney <tim@zacktron.com> wrote in message news:4.2.0.58.199908...omm.com... (...) Actually, they do have set numbers. Go to the Pause DB and search for "Idea Book" to see for yourself. I think they should be included for many of the same (...) (25 years ago, 2-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting page for 9906
|
|
(...) Okay, I looked at the pieces, and here are my thoughts on the ones I had problems with: Can the insertion points for the castle doors be moved closer to the hinged part? Not a big deal, it just kinda bugs me. ;) 2552 - The lines that make up (...) (25 years ago, 2-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: are idea book models going to be accepted into the omr?
|
|
(...) No. They do not have set numbers and were not released into the market individually packaged with their own pieces. -Tim <>< (URL) timcourtne ICQ: 23951114 Get paid to surf the web! Visit: (URL) (25 years ago, 2-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | are idea book models going to be accepted into the omr?
|
|
are idea book models going to be accepted into the omr? they are lego models designed by the lego group and published as instructions by the lego group so we should probobly accept them if we are going to make the omr complete. (25 years ago, 1-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | is it ok to ldraw sets that are missing sails and/or string?
|
|
is it ok to ldraw sets that are missing sails and/or string? neither can be put in ldraw yet so... what about other cloth items (capes,flags etc) (25 years ago, 1-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: what are the rules about hoses etc?
|
|
or wait untill whoever made the technic hose pieces submits them for voting. (25 years ago, 29-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: what are the rules about hoses etc?
|
|
(...) You can create a reasonable rendition of a Technic hose using John Van's Hose spreadsheet and replacing the 754.dats with 4-4cyli.dats of the correct length and diameter. --Bram Bram Lambrecht / o o \ BramL@juno.com (...) (25 years ago, 29-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: what are the rules about hoses etc?
|
|
(...) what i meant to say is that the really large technic type flexable hoses cant go into a model yet because they have not been made (25 years ago, 29-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: what are the rules about hoses etc?
|
|
(...) Hoses go in the model. End of discussion (unless a serious user comes up with a really good and logical reason otherwise). (...) When it becomes possible, they are required too. (...) Yes and no. Some parts, depending on where they are in the (...) (25 years ago, 28-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Mirroring in LDraw (was: Re: what are the rules about hoses etc?)
|
|
(...) It's not that much more complicated, as long as you want to mirror across the *model's* orientation, not the *part's* orientation. If you've got a part command: 1 15 x y z a b c d e f g h i part.dat And you want to mirror on X (switch right (...) (25 years ago, 28-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: what are the rules about hoses etc?
|
|
(...) here is my thoughts: hoses go in model if possible (technic hoses for example cant be put in) the same goes for wire,string,rubber bands (when someone makes a way of puting those in) all those type of parts go into a seperate sub file for each (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Submission and Storage
|
|
(...) I'm not disagreeing here. But could it be optional to editors to change a pivot point if they feel they have the time or if they feel that it would severely enhance the model? I'll also add the pivot point thing to the creation/submission (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Ldraw.org-- Sets Tracker
|
|
(...) That's an excellent idea, and I *probably* thought of it for a split second but forgot :) I don't personally have the capability of making one of those, but if someone would like to or if Jacob could make a quick program for it, I can make a (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Mindspring Issue 990722-5791744 (Was: Re: ldraw.org Not Found)
|
|
(...) I am hearing the same things from Mindspring and am working with them and Jacob Sparre Andersen to see that the problem gets solved. The attached Mindspring trouble ticket number is 990722-5791744. From now on I'll try to cc all correspondence (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: ldraw.org Not Found
|
|
I just did some more research. www.nordu.net has two networks in Denmark, Darenet at www.darnet.dk and Sektornet at (URL) was able to reach nordu.net's main site and Sektornet (for a short time). I recieved the same timeout error with darnet that I (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | ldraw.org Not Found
|
|
This has been a problem for me ever since I first started trying to reach (URL) have already been several messages out about it in different threads, and I would like to start this one to try and solve the problem. The problem appears to be a (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: what are the rules about hoses etc?
|
|
(...) Nope. I agree with what you guys are saying on hoses too. They *should* be in the model. And its not a job left over for the model editors either ;) -Tim <>< (URL) timcourtne ICQ: 23951114 Get paid to surf the web! Visit: (URL) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: what are the rules about hoses etc?
|
|
(...) I didn't mean the address, I meant the "Scott R Dennett" bit. I see I was wrong. Do both you and your dad use the same email address? Doesn't that get annoying? (...) read (...) It's not in the tutorial. Let's say the part looks like this: | | (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Ldraw.org-- Sets Tracker
|
|
Tim, I know this has been suggested before, but do you have the capability to set up something under the OMR that would be like the parts tracker, but for sets. This would be of great help so that duplications are not made(if we were to mark each (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: what are the rules about hoses etc?
|
|
(...) <dennett@agate.net> (...) Actually I sent that from the web, but I thought my dad had fixed it. This is coming from my email program so if it's still in caps, please let me know. (...) making the (...) correct (...) pieces(going (...) end up (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: what are the rules about hoses etc?
|
|
On Sun, 25 Jul 1999 23:52:41 GMT "Ryan Dennett" <dennett@agate.net> writes: ^^^^ You finally fixed the email address! ;) (...) point (...) If it goes from the right point to the right point, it should end up looking pretty much like the real hose (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: what are the rules about hoses etc?
|
|
(...) Of course you have to do the hoses. I don't think that in making the hoses they have to be as shown, but as long as they go from correct point A to correct point B, and don't interfere with any other pieces(going through them) it should be (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | what are the rules about hoses etc?
|
|
what are the rules for the OMR regarding the use of flex tubing,flexable hoses etc? do we add them? do we have to add them? do we not add them? do we put them in a seperate subfile? do we put them into the model? what about string and elastic (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Fwd: Issue 990722-5791744
|
|
On the Mindspring error - this is the reply I got from their tech support. I forwarded this to Jacob so he could take a look at it. (...) -Tim Courtney ldraw.org Project Coordinator (URL) timcourtne ICQ: 23951114 (25 years ago, 25-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting page for 9906
|
|
Terry, For whatever reason (I think my ISP Mindspring had been named as one before) I still cannot access ldraw.org. It is very frustrating to know so much stuff is going on at this site and NOT be able to access it. I feel we might need to go back (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting page for 9906
|
|
(...) But it was originally introduced as a Technic ski pole. And with that name, it goes great with the "2713.DAT Technic Ski" part. It's quite true that it is also used in many other sets, such as model team sets. But the Fabuland shovel is still (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting page for 9906
|
|
COOL!!!! large and medium castle doors!!!!! Thanks guys! Ok Terry we'll do that, hope you have a great holiday and enjoy yourself! Now.. I haven't looked at the parts yet, though I already don't think the "technic ski pole" should have that name.. (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting page for 9906
|
|
name suggestions for the new parts... 2552 to baseplate 32 x 32 mountain plate 3004p03 and 3004p04 to brick 1 x 2 with yellow up/down arrow with black arrow pattern container pannier d-basket to minifig catogory? minifig bow with arrow to minifig (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Voting page for 9906
|
|
OK part fiends, The voting page for update 9906 is up and running: (URL) *should* be all ready to go. I hope so, as my new computer just got zapped by lightning and the modem died. (using the old computer right now). One small error is the 2400 and (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Submission and Storage
|
|
(...) Ok, I wasn't aware of that... Cool :) -Tim <>< (URL) timcourtne ICQ: 23951114 Get paid to surf the web! Visit: (URL) (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Submission and Storage
|
|
Tim Courtney <tim@zacktron.com> wrote in message news:4.2.0.58.199907...omm.com... (...) LDraw also runs on unix machines, which is why tarballs are needed. -John Van (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Submission and Storage
|
|
Tim Courtney <tim@zacktron.com> wrote in message news:4.2.0.58.199907...omm.com... (...) You can--using LDAO's editor. But you still would have to go through and figure out all the pivot points, where the hinge piece should be compared to where it (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Submission and Storage
|
|
I believe IIRC stands for If I Remember Correctly. IIDRC :) please do correct me. Ryan ***...*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***...*** (...) was pretty much (...) then... (...) have the same (...) quality models. (...) some point... (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Submission and Storage
|
|
(...) Hehe :) (...) I didn't catch that thread... (...) Good, my memory isn't failing in old age ;) (...) *nark* *nark* *nark* :) -Tim <>< (URL) timcourtne ICQ: 23951114 Get paid to surf the web! Visit: (URL) (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Submission and Storage
|
|
(...) It would be easier if you could move a bunch of parts as a group all at once... 8< snip the light.dat trick explanation... Thanks... I get it now, I guess I'm not that serious an LDraw user :) -Tim <>< (URL) timcourtne ICQ: 23951114 Get paid (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Submission and Storage
|
|
(...) Ok... BTW, what does IIRC mean?? -Tim <>< (URL) timcourtne ICQ: 23951114 Get paid to surf the web! Visit: (URL) (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Submission and Storage
|
|
Thanks Bram. I was thinking along that line, but forgot about light.dat That would work just fine. Ryan ***...*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***...*** (...) plate (...) means (...) 4275/4276, you (...) light.dat as a (...) couple (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Submission and Storage
|
|
(...) from (...) now. ;) I wouldn't expect a lazy person like you to go searching for a link :) I didn't know if you might happen to know what it was off the top of your head. I know that would be asking a lot :) (...) you??......Good (...) types (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Submission and Storage
|
|
Tim Courtney <tim@zacktron.com> wrote in message news:4.2.0.58.199907...omm.com... (...) No, that would take too much time to fix all the submodels. The center of a submodel is just the 0,0,0 point of the submodel file. Like Bram mentioned, putting (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Submission and Storage
|
|
(...) What is the point of doing a set in ldraw if it is not going to be submitted to the OMR? Since we have the models.sets, we don't need the OMR group. If I remember correctly, Todd originally made models.sets *for* the OMR (or at least that was (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: excuses website (formerly posted in a dat-group)
|
|
(...) Problem is may be is in your URL: (URL) you have backlash just before image filename it must be normal slash as follows (URL) well Gintaras (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | excuses website (formerly posted in a dat-group)
|
|
Hi, There were some major problems with my internet-upload-connection, but that's no excuse for the wrong newsgroup and the missing pictures. I've tried it again, with a few new POV-ray renderings and available dat-files. When I've finished the (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Ring logo / Cover page image
|
|
(...) Would you? Thanks. There are a lot of really nice ones there. He is a pretty good artist. Right now I have the snowy mountaintop with clouds scene. Perhaps for the psychological effect it gives while living in the desert heat. :-) -- Terry K (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Submission and Storage
|
|
(...) IIRC, there wasn't any "OMR" at that point...but they both have the same exact underlying philosophy -- capturing a collection of quality models. I always planned to point to the models from the Pause-DB at some point... From April 3: (URL) (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Submission and Storage
|
|
(...) Cool... (...) Ok.. (...) I think it should go to cad.dat.models for unfinished ones... (...) Ok, I was under the understanding that .cad.dat.models.sets was pretty much set and created without the OMR in mind. This works, then... -Tim <>< (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Submission and Storage
|
|
(...) Certainly! (...) Heck, I sure don't think so. The .dat.models.sets group was intended to be a serious thing. The only question in my mind would be whether to allow in-progress models there (i.e., without an OMR-tagged subject line) or whether (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Submission and Storage
|
|
At 10:40 PM 7/22/99 , Todd Lehman wrote: [...] snippety snip (...) Right.. (...) Now that's making sense. I was following the assumption that nothing would change on cad.dat.models.sets and OMR submissions would be *allowed* there. Could we change (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Submission and Storage
|
|
(...) So basically no difference, really. That is, you can visually scan a hundred messages for "OMR" in a second or two -- or even faster with a script -- but where 99.9% of the time goes is verifying the quality of the model. So pulling down 5 new (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Submission and Storage
|
|
(...) If you mean 2429/2430, it's already centered! If you mean 4275/4276, you can use the method outlined in my LDraw Tutorial, using light.dat as a place-holder for the origin (0,0,0). You'll have to look at a couple different views to make sure (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Submission and Storage
|
|
(...) Searching through a potential lot of messages for the word 'OMR.' (...) But posting a submission to an OMR group and casually posting to a sets group are in fact different. One there is strict requirements for, the other there isn't. So it (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Submission and Storage
|
|
(...) So do I. But I probably wouldn't subscribe to a sets or omr newsgroup by mail. It would work, but why not avoid possible confusion and go for 100% certainty on a completely new dedicated newsgroup? Some people might think that (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Submission and Storage
|
|
(...) Yes. Those that are non-instruction submodels but purely for ease of modelling are definitely acceptable. (I gotta remember to throw that one in the creation/submission guide) (...) Good thoughts. I would say that the models which do not (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
