| |
On Fri, 20 Aug 1999 02:32:37 GMT, Tim Courtney <tim@zacktron.com> wrote:
> ... Yes, you're right, it is a valid issue...but I think not alerting
> TLG to the problem would be the wiser solution.
Not contacting them is a simpler short-term solution. And it's one that is
often used. I haven't asked them about the 2x3 brick icon used by LDAO,
both as the program icon, and on the LDAO homepage. But calling inaction a
"wiser solution" is inaccurate, because it's neither.
> A simple disclaimer would
> more than do in this case, IMO.
Most likely, you are right about this.
I'd still like to see a cool, original graphic logo for ldraw.org.
Unfortunately, I seem to have no talent in that direction.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: [ldraw.org] Update
|
| Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:37bd5e73.642071...net.com... (...) What about the brick fading from outline to raytrace as the logo. That seems to me different enough from the LEGO uses of bricks, and it is certainly (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.publish)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Update
|
| (...) Yeah, I saw that program and downloaded it and just had to write about it :) Mike fully cooperated with my efforts to promote it (I wonder why) ;) and is very open to suggestions for future features. (...) Though this may be a way of covering (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.publish)
|
44 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
