| |
Tim Courtney wrote:
>
> At 11:19 AM 8/20/99 , Steve Bliss wrote:
> > As long as it was a color other than red, it would probably be OK.
>
> I'd prefer to keep it red.
Why? Seems to me that changing to white or grey or blue, if it meant
approval
from TLG would be no big deal... Red is the color they use for most
everything
brickish.
> I don't think a wireframe fade would be
> considered under TLG's trade dress if a squabble arose.
Probably would in fact be trade dress, as would every other thing we've
discussed. But TLG, I think, would respond well to a polite letter
asking for review and advice, with alternatives presented.
Trade dress is rather sweeping in what it encompasses.
--
Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com http://my.voyager.net/lar
- - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ Member ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to
lugnet.
NOTE: I have left CTP, effective 18 June 99, and my CTP email
will not work after then. Please switch to my Novera ID.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: [ldraw.org] Update
|
| (...) On the small logos it probably would not work, so another solution would have to be devised for that. (...) I'd prefer to keep it red. I don't think a wireframe fade would be considered under TLG's trade dress if a squabble arose. (...) I (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.publish)
|
44 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
