Subject:
|
Re: backgrounds logo image (was: Re: [ldraw.org] Update)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Sat, 21 Aug 1999 23:35:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
542 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.publish, Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net> writes:
> Todd Lehman wrote:
> > I don't see anything there stating that the links back have to be text
> > links.
>
> Well if they're not text links, what are they to be then?
Use your imagination. If someone wanted, they could use any of:
* Plain text (obviously :)
* Rendered text, as seen for example in the left column of
<http://www.ldraw.org/>
* A screenshot/thumbnail (almost certainly fair use if it's not too big),
with or without accompanying text
* A picture of a polar bear in a snowstorm
* A picture of a polka-dotted hippopotamus dancing on the head of a pin
* etc.
Just because no graphic image is supplied for the backgrounds sub-area
doesn't mean someone can't make and use their own if they wanted to. (Not
that anyone would really ever probably want to make their own, when the
background images already speak for themselves, but anyway.)
> You've removed the logo, right?
No. I removed the embedded flb-logo-small.gif image from the HTML code on
the splash page. The logo is still there, but it now exists as HTML text
rather than an embedded image.
> So text is only choice available.
No. It never was the only choice available (for links), and isn't now
either.
> Under the first numbered item, nothing other than backgrounds themselves
> is allowed to be copied and you don't support linking in.
Correct.
> I suppose one could compose one's OWN graphic logo for Fibblesnork, but
> that rather flagrantly defeats the notion that you, Todd, should have
> control of what the logo looks like, no?
To compose a logo for it would be one thing; to use an image in tandem with
a link is another thing.
> In the grand scheme of things this IS small potatoes.
Indeed it is. However, you wouldn't expect me to not to address incorrect
statements about the rules of linking, would you?
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: backgrounds logo image (was: Re: [ldraw.org] Update)
|
| Once again, insufficient precision results in my looking rather foolish (but I meant to do that, I never make misteaks). (...) <various hypothetical, but not branded, non text ways of depicting a hyperlink> What I was getting at is that while (...) (25 years ago, 23-Aug-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: backgrounds logo image (was: Re: [ldraw.org] Update)
|
| (...) Well if they're not text links, what are they to be then? You've removed the logo, right? So text is only choice available. Under the first numbered item, nothing other than backgrounds themselves is allowed to be copied and you don't support (...) (25 years ago, 21-Aug-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
44 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
