Subject:
|
Re: LDLite extended syntax (was: Re: Parts license)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Mon, 25 Sep 2000 22:26:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1479 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Steve Bliss writes:
> In lugnet.cad.dev, Paul Gyugyi wrote:
>
> > Issue: do I have to document the extended syntax? Do
> > I need to submit the modified stud.dat, even though
> > it is not in a useful form?
>
> I forgot to ask: have you added more statements in LDLite 2.0? Are you
> planning on documenting them?
No, I havn't, but past performance is no indication of future results. :)
> I noticed the documentation of the LDL extensions is gone from the LDLite
> homepage.
Oh, I just trimmed down the page because it was too long. That should
all still be in the readme files.
-gyug
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
73 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
