Subject:
|
Re: Who are 'ldraw.org'? (was: Parts license)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 22 Sep 2000 21:24:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1139 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Anders Isaksson writes:
> 'Normal' organizations usually include both 'active' and 'passive' members,
> i.e. you don't have to work _in_ the organization to be part of it. You can
> just support the ideas.
>
> As ldraw.org isn't a 'normal' organization, with actual membership, I don't
> think there can be any other definition than yours:
I consider myself a member of the "LCAD community" in that I use the ldraw
program, Steve's LDAO, and the parts ref on LUGNET. I promote the ldraw.org
web site, keep intending to submit an entry for the MOTM, believe in the open
nature of the program and parts files, believe that there should be some
quality standards for parts, etc. So as long as there is no official
membership critera for being in "The Organization" I will consider myself a
member of the organization.
Having said that, I can't see myself ever authoring a part, and maybe never
voting on parts. I would pay a fee to be an official "member" of an
official "Organization" especially if this got me a CD with the most recent
program and parts libraries, and maybe even a semiannual update.
BEN GATRELLE
(remove the spam dot from the yellowcastle to reply)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Who are 'ldraw.org'? (was: Parts license)
|
| Steve Bliss skrev i meddelandet ... (...) I would count any part author as _in_ ldraw.org, especially if you are considered _in_ just by voting on a part release... (...) 'Normal' organizations usually include both 'active' and 'passive' members, (...) (24 years ago, 22-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
73 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
