Subject:
|
Re: Parts license
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 21 Sep 2000 15:43:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1107 times
|
| |
|
|
"Leonardo Zide" <leonardo@centroin.com.br> wrote in message
news:39CA2C31.7D06F32D@centroin.com.br...
> Steve Bliss wrote:
> >
> > > - A person is free to use and redistribute the parts (a small fee may
> > > be charged to cover media costs).
> > > - If a person makes any changes to the files then this person must
> > > publish his changes back to the community using the original license.
> >
> > The basic question here is too big for a few people to decide; it • concerns
> > everyone who includes themselves in 'the group known as ldraw.org'.
>
> And who would that group be ? Only person who actually do some work
> directly for ldraw.org or it includes everyone who contributed a part to
> the library or a program ?
I don't have a ton of time to reply to comments on library distribution, but
here's a little clarification on what I see as Steve referring to 'the group
known as ldraw.org.'
I see it as the group of a few caretakers of LDraw, being Steve, Terry,
Jacob, and myself. None of us have any official authority - but all of us
have taken on responsibilities to maintain this format in direct regards to
the website.
Parts authors are independent contributors to the libraries, and IMO haven't
had anything official to do with the _site_ and distribution, though their
contributions are definitely significant (its of a different nature).
There's no official organization of this group, and perhaps there should be
in the future of LCAD. As to how to go about this, its pretty unclear, and
the opinion of the Jessimans' would probably be required.
--
Tim Courtney - tim@zacktron.com
http://www.ldraw.org - Centralized LDraw Resources
http://www.zacktron.com - Zacktron Alliance
ICQ: 23951114
AIM: TimCourtne
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Parts license
|
| (...) And who would that group be ? Only person who actually do some work directly for ldraw.org or it includes everyone who contributed a part to the library or a program ? (...) I think redistribution is too vague, we should have different (...) (24 years ago, 21-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
73 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
