Subject:
|
LDLite extended syntax (was: Re: Parts license)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Mon, 25 Sep 2000 19:46:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1342 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Paul Gyugyi wrote:
> Issue: do I have to document the extended syntax? Do
> I need to submit the modified stud.dat, even though
> it is not in a useful form?
I forgot to ask: have you added more statements in LDLite 2.0? Are you
planning on documenting them?
I noticed the documentation of the LDL extensions is gone from the LDLite
homepage.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Parts license
|
| Have you covered the case where a parts author submits a new part for review, but because of errors the part is rejected? I think you should still have ldraw.org retain rights to modify and distribute, so that someone else could clean up the file (...) (24 years ago, 21-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
73 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
