To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 5251
5250  |  5252
Subject: 
Re: Parts license
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Fri, 22 Sep 2000 17:37:16 GMT
Viewed: 
1404 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dev, Larry Pieniazek writes:
In lugnet.cad.dev, Jacob Sparre Andersen writes:
Steve:


5. If ldraw.org permanently ceases to publish or distribute the Library, all
licenses to the works contained in the library will be revoked.

I have a strong dislike for revokable licenses. I think
this paragraph should be dropped.

I suggested a reword for it. However I'm not sure your likes and dislikes are
germane. The intent of this paragraph is to ensure that if LDraw.org should
cease to exist, it is clear what should happen. That is, that the rights
should revert and no successor org has rights without reacquiring them.

Oh, one other thing I just thought of. IS this what we want to have happen? Or
does the "defunct" Ldraw.org need to "retain" rights in order to preserve
them? I dunno.

Also, we need to check to make sure that using non-exclusive is sufficient,
that is, do we have a position on other organizations that may come into
existance, or on what else parts authors can do with their parts? I'm thinking
we should not try to prevent either.

++Lar



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Parts license
 
(...) Like Larry said, I included item II.5 in order to deal with the case of ldraw.org. I understand how Jacob feels about revokable licenses, but I'm OK with this idea, because ldraw.org is the party which is terminating the license. Maybe it (...) (24 years ago, 25-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Parts license
 
(...) I suggested a reword for it. However I'm not sure your likes and dislikes are germane. The intent of this paragraph is to ensure that if LDraw.org should cease to exist, it is clear what should happen. That is, that the rights should revert (...) (24 years ago, 22-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)

73 Messages in This Thread:





























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR