To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 5209
5208  |  5210
Subject: 
Re: Parts license
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Sun, 17 Sep 2000 23:53:21 GMT
Viewed: 
1111 times
  
"Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message
news:G11svz.4IH@lugnet.com...
In lugnet.cad.dev, Leonardo Zide writes:
[...]
Optional condition: The parts can only be used by free programs.
(don't know if this is really needed but I wouldn't mind it for my
parts)
[...]

Sounds interesting.  I would rather see it under something like Perl's
Artistic License than GPL, though.  How do you define "programs"?  And
the license should be careful not to preclude the possibility of LEGO • using
or interfacing with the parts somehow someday.

--Todd

Something to be considered.  I could give the Jessimans' an email soon (I
haven't heard from them in a while) and ask them about the parts that James
authored.  Otherwise, someone with experience in law might be good to draft
up a license for the parts.

I'll write myself a note to email them and get on it in the next day or so.
--

Tim Courtney - tim@zacktron.com

http://www.ldraw.org - Centralized LDraw Resources
http://www.zacktron.com - Zacktron Alliance

ICQ: 23951114
AIM: TimCourtne



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Parts license
 
(...) One thing I forgot to add -- In the spirit of open content, I think that any license that comes about ought to at least require that the republisher of the data must give a link to www.ldraw.org so that anyone using the parts or any (...) (24 years ago, 18-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
  Re: Parts license
 
(...) Why don't you hold off until we've got a decent parts-contributor-license put together? Although, the last I knew, they got this group via e-mail. So I hope they're reading this now, and can support us on this. Steve (24 years ago, 18-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Parts license
 
(...) Sounds interesting. I would rather see it under something like Perl's Artistic License than GPL, though. How do you define "programs"? And the license should be careful not to preclude the possibility of LEGO using or interfacing with the (...) (24 years ago, 17-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)

73 Messages in This Thread:





























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR