Subject:
|
Re: Parts license
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Mon, 25 Sep 2000 19:49:22 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1148 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Bram Lambrecht wrote:
> Steve Bliss writes:
> > Should ldraw.org restrict redistributions of the parts library? Or should
> > people be able to modify and publish their own versions of the library, as
> > they see fit?
>
> Have we heard a POV on this from the Jessimans?
The general POV from the Jessimans is they are trusting us to do what is
right/best. I take that to mean they are likely to agree to what we want
to do, but we will definitely want to ask for express agreement, once we
have a concrete proposal.
> The fact that ldraw.org is sometimes hard to reach for some people mean we
> should definitely allow mirrors (maybe the mirrors need to have permission?)
Sounds like we might get something going on Brickshelf. :)
> Also, I think LCAD programmers should be allowed to modify the parts (like
> Leonardo Zide does) to work with their own programs.
Agree.
> Maybe we should
> require or request that the programmers make conversion programs (which go
> both ways) avaiable.
I don't think that's always going to be practical.
> Links back to ldraw.org should definitely be required,
> at least to show respect to JJ.
Respect is important, but requiring links also protects users from paying
for something they can get for no-charge.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | RE: Parts license
|
| (...) Have we heard a POV on this from the Jessimans? The fact that ldraw.org is sometimes hard to reach for some people mean we should definitely allow mirrors (maybe the mirrors need to have permission?) Also, I think LCAD programmers should be (...) (24 years ago, 21-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
73 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
